The ISA parser now emits the code required to access matrix
registers. In the case where a register is both a source and a
destination, the ISA parser generates appropriate code to make sure
that the contents of the source is copied to the destination. This is
required for the O3 CPU which treats these as two different physical
registers, and hence data is lost if not explicitly preserved.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-1289
Change-Id: I8796bd1ea55b5edf5fb8ab92ef1a6060ccc58fa1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/64338
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
An example case,
```python
mem_side_port = RequestPort(
"This port sends requests and " "receives responses"
)
```
This is the residue of running the python formatter.
This is done by finding all tokens matching the regex `"\s"(?![.;"])`
and manually replacing them by empty strings.
Change-Id: Icf223bbe889e5fa5749a81ef77aa6e721f38b549
Signed-off-by: Hoa Nguyen <hoanguyen@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/66111
Reviewed-by: Bobby Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Bobby Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This regular expression currently has a negative lookbehind assertion
that the operand name isn't preceded by any numbers or letters. Expand
that to also include the : character, since no operand should have a
namespace specifier in front of it.
Change-Id: I0bd84b69b9dad278191831d82db762ae75ce4bf1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/49751
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The classes defined by the ISA description are actually just descriptors
which are used to make more specialized Operand classes, and then those
classes are instantiated to represent actual operands in a given
instruction. There they encode the actual index of the register, any
extensions used, etc.
To make defining operand types in the ISA more flexible and to take less
explicit machinery, this change defines a mechanism to allow overriding
individual methods of the operand class. This should for instance make
the read_code and write_code members of those classes unnecessary.
Change-Id: I1a1f787970ba56bd2884a80df4618a77eb454605
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/49740
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
The correct accessor is well known by the code providing a template for
buildReadCode/buildWriteCode, and so can be simply inserted without the
indirection. This makes the code a little easier to read, and those
templating functions simpler and easier to understand.
Change-Id: I403c6e4c291708f8b58cce08bfa32ee2a930c296
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/49737
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Some operand types had read/write code overrides, I think largely by
pattern matching other operand types, and not because that code was
actually expected to be used or to work. Instead, we should just assert
that that code isn't used and remove the implementation. This method of
affecting reading and writing code is going away anyway, and if this is
needed in the future it can be replaced in the new system.
Change-Id: Idae886153aa343570109069cbe54e2c1699a34e5
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/49736
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These correspond to the existing operand types like IntRegOperand, or as
it's called in the operand table 'IntReg'. These subclasses
automatically set the base type name ('IntReg' for IntRegOperands),
which results in some mildly more familiar looking syntax, but is still
not that different from what we have today.
Change-Id: Id77c4e5a5e1b93c10aa9ad85e1a615f6c145832a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/49725
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Currently, to specify operands for an ISA, you define a dict from
operand names to properties in the ISA description. The properties are
in a list which has well defined positions for each entry, some of which
are optional.
These lists are fairly opaque since they don't have any way to, for
instance, accept keyword arguments. Also, these specifications simply
list as their first element what type of operand they're going to be.
This change is the first step in turning these specifications into
something more robust like a small temporary object. This object can be
constructed from a class which has a proper constructor that can take
keyword arguments, can have defaults, and can be subclassed.
Change-Id: I5f24d0b41f3e30b24a1ddd10157965d700d6c906
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/49724
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These methods were all identical, except that IntRegOperand and
CCRegOperand classes had logic to handle operand predication. Since the
other operand types won't have predicates set, we can use the superset
version, and the other types will reduce to what they used to in
practice.
Change-Id: I51eeedcacb7cfc6e2c136742701ee9bf80ec4e15
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/49721
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
There are a number of operand types which are registers. Define a
RegOperand type which they can all inherit from to get register generic
functionality. This will also become a way to add generic register types
with malleable properties at the ISA level.
Change-Id: I01a1d5d133d8f64106d005a744631f64e6808e57
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/49719
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These registers used to be accessed with a two dimensional index, with
one dimension specifying the register, and the second index specifying
the element within that register. This change linearizes that index down
to one dimension, where the elements of each register are laid out one
after the other in sequence.
Change-Id: I41110f57b505679a327108369db61c826d24922e
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/49148
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
When calling a method in a superclass, you can/should use the super()
method to get a reference to that class. The python 2 version of that
method takes two parameters, the current class name, and the "self"
instance. The python 3 version takes no arguments. This is better for a
at least three reasons.
First, this version is less verbose because you don't have to specify
any arguments.
Second, you don't have to remember which argument goes where (I always
have to look it up), and you can't accidentally use the wrong class
name, or forget to update it if you copy code from a different class.
Third, this version will work correctly if you use a class decorator.
I don't know exactly how the mechanics of this work, but it is referred
to in a comment on this stackoverflow question:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/681953/how-to-decorate-a-class
Change-Id: I427737c8f767e80da86cd245642e3b057121bc3b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52224
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Apply the gem5 namespace to the codebase.
Some anonymous namespaces could theoretically be removed,
but since this change's main goal was to keep conflicts
at a minimum, it was decided not to modify much the
general shape of the files.
A few missing comments of the form "// namespace X" that
occurred before the newly added "} // namespace gem5"
have been added for consistency.
std out should not be included in the gem5 namespace, so
they weren't.
ProtoMessage has not been included in the gem5 namespace,
since I'm not familiar with how proto works.
Regarding the SystemC files, although they belong to gem5,
they actually perform integration between gem5 and SystemC;
therefore, it deserved its own separate namespace.
Files that are automatically generated have been included
in the gem5 namespace.
The .isa files currently are limited to a single namespace.
This limitation should be later removed to make it easier
to accomodate a better API.
Regarding the files in util, gem5:: was prepended where
suitable. Notice that this patch was tested as much as
possible given that most of these were already not
previously compiling.
Change-Id: Ia53d404ec79c46edaa98f654e23bc3b0e179fe2d
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/46323
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Poremba <matthew.poremba@amd.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This should be either the fixed index if there are no predicated
operands (ie operands which may not be used), and an auto incrementing
index otherwise. This is still not bulletproof since the auto
incrementing index is just code which ++-es the index, and so the index
will be different and incremented each time that value is substituted
in.
Also, the mixture of predicated operands and the vector operands is
broken and will not generate compilable code, but I'm not going to try
to fix that here.
Change-Id: I1ceae519649762e54eaa019610e51bb8c21d28d6
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/42970
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
This code was simplified a little while ago, and the wrong variable name
was used in that computation accidentally. Fortunately the "wrong" value
would be too large, and so nothing bad would happen except a pair of
arrays would be overly large in the O3 instruction class.
Change-Id: I9694f1a8c79a62a172ef63bdd2f98fa0ace06acd
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/38383
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
When parsing an ISA description, the InstObjParams class needs to have a
reference to the current parser. It does that by exposing a wrapper to
the description rather than the actual InstObjParams class. That wrapper
injects an additional argument into the InstObjParams constructor.
Originally, the wrapper which injectect the additional argument was a
function which masqueraded as a class. That made it impossible to
subclass InstObjParams.
Instead, this change replaces that function wrapper with a class
wrapper, and injects the extra argument in the __init__ method. This
preserves the fact that the InstObjParams name refers to a class, and
allows any sort of interaction that's normally allowed with a class like
subclassing.
Change-Id: I550ea2e60eadac3c7c0b9afa7d71f4607b49a5d2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/39275
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
