When defining a static constexpr variable in C++11, it is still
required to have a separate definition someplace, something that can
be particularly problematic in template classes. C++17 fixes this
problem by adding inline variables which don't, but in the mean time
having a static constexpr value with no backing store will, if the
compiler decides to not fold away the storage location, cause linking
errors.
This happened to me when trying to build the debug build of ARM just
now.
By turning these expressions into static inline functions, then they
no longer need definitions elsewhere, still fold away to nothing, and
are compliant with C++11 which is currently the standard gem5 expects
to be using.
Change-Id: I647d7cf4a1e8de98251ee9ef116f007e08eac1f3
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24964
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chun-Chen TK Hsu <chunchenhsu@google.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
gem5 does not historically distinguish between address spaces when
interacting with gdb, and gdb doesn't really give it any address space
information to work with. To ensure we catch whatever address space
we might be in by the time we get to the interesting address, we'll set
a breakpoint in all possible address spaces simultaneously with the
expectation that we'll hit one of them.
Change-Id: I9f4b93d04914db7a3c42be6236a523d35194afda
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25268
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chun-Chen TK Hsu <chunchenhsu@google.com>
When the last event is removed from a breakpoint, then the breakpoint
itself is uninstalled from IRIS, and the list is deleted. Even though
the list has been traversed and so we don't lose track of any other
events that need to be processed, we also still need to check against
end() to see that we're done. If that now freed memory gets
overwritten, then we won't see the end and will wander right off the
end of the list into nonsense.
This change modifies the breakpoint info tracking structure to keep a
shared pointer to the event list. The pointer will still automatically
manage the list's memory so that it doesn't leak, and it won't get
deleted out from under us as we're iterating through it.
Change-Id: I5ad0f095d07f0a3a5cce9c10f03121827a674c33
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24965
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chun-Chen TK Hsu <chunchenhsu@google.com>
This only seems to be used from outside of the CPU when resetting state
at the start of execution. Since this state is already reset in
fast model, we can mostly ignore that call for now.
When more accessors are implemented, this function can be use them to
clear registers like it would on other thread contexts.
Change-Id: I5146273387ec17987770abc67f6f426c4480e0b9
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24967
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chun-Chen TK Hsu <chunchenhsu@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
ArmISA::clear resets the value of the architecture registers. Some of
these are cached in ArmTLB, including SCTLR. This patch invalidates the
cached copies on clear; this fixes a bug when resetting CPU cores by which
the cached SCTLR was used and SCTLR.M was set, resulting in non-arch
compliant reset behaviour and a PA being treated as a VA on translation.
Change-Id: I8d4eeeaf807325bd7b300a7a317abfa40ad23c87
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25466
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This is achieved by using keyword arguments to improve readibility.
Some of the building helpers are using native types and can be annoying
for a reader to understand what those sequences of number and boolean
mean. It is also easier in this way to commit mistakes.
Change-Id: I63081d09a1f621550c5b6522b8107f349939b21d
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ciro Santilli <ciro.santilli@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24044
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This was primarily in Alpha where disassmbly output could be compatible
(default off, probably not usd in a long time), and floating point
could be compatible (default on). A small bit had crept into x86 from
long ago which is also removed.
Change-Id: Ibb68b63787f370259bd1613b393e0b057c007704
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25012
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These instructions were extracting a bitfield by masking it, but then
didn't shift the bit into the correct position. They were then
comparing it with 1, which clang 11 correctly complained would always
be false. That warning became an error which broke the build.
This fixes that problem by switching that line and the few surrounding
lines to use the bits() function which removes the need to manually
mask or shift values. That makes it less likely for there to be a
mistake, and also makes it more obvious which bits are being accessed.
Change-Id: I692214f898e90dc7d5de460d1da2ef6aefda4fb8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25224
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
By using braced initializer lists and dropping the default
unimplementedFunc implementation function, the SyscallDesc tables
become a lot less crowded, and it's now very obvious which syscalls
are implemented just by quickly visually scanning the table.
This will also make it a lot easier to change the underlying type
stored in the table without having to adjust all of the instances
within them.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I7821de74812e1c02ca4550fc9c46cc2188cf1bd0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23189
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
+ ArmISA.py: Enabling the feature adding QARMA algorithm as default.
+ faults.cc/faults.hh: Add PACTrapFault
+ includes/insts.isa: Adding new isa files.
+ aarch64.isa: Add decode part for PAC instructions
+ pauth.isa: Isa for PAC instructions
+ misc64.isa: PAC instructions templates
+ miscregs.cc/hh/types: New Registers for PAC Key low/high.
+ types.hh: Modification of system registers that were incomplete
for ARMv8
+ utility.hh: Add isSecureEL2 enabled. The function is there but will
always return false for now.
+ pauth_helpers.hh/cc: Implementation of auxiliar functions and derivates.
+ qarma.hh/cc: This functions follow ARMv8 reference pseudo code
implementing QARMA block cipher algorithms.
Change-Id: I3095a1279204206d9a816a4fb7fc176c18f9680b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25024
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Because the fast models (or at least the one we've looked at) give
access to the integer registers mostly based on the current view of
those registers, it does its own flattening and prevents accessing most
of the raw storage locations without this extra level of mapping. To
store to the flattened locations, we need to unflatten the indexes and
in one case shift the mode so that we get the right values.
Some registers which have irrelevant values for fast model (the "PC"
which is actually diverted elsewhere, the zero register, microcode
registers, and the "dummy" register), and those are left out of the
mapping so that they return 0 and blow up gem5 when someone attempts to
set them.
Change-Id: Ia2d315d5ca4c8a65b17ad52beff3a366ca8b3d46
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23791
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Chun-Chen TK Hsu <chunchenhsu@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
These don't have anything in them at the moment since making some ISA
methods virtual and not inlined will likely add overhead, specifically
the ones for flattening registers. Some code may need to be rearranged
to minimize that overhead before the ISA objects can be truly put
behind a generic interface.
Change-Id: Ie36a771e977535a7996fdff701ce202bb95c8c58
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25007
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Some AArch64 system registers report UNDEFINED behaviours if accessed
from EL2 or EL3 in a non-EL2 Host enabled (HCR_EL2.E2H == 0) environment.
Examples of these are seen in the Generic Timer system registers,
namely CNTP_CTL_EL02 or CNTKCTL_EL12.
This patch provides an ISA filter for specifying the above condition.
Change-Id: I240f9afdb000faf5d3c9274ba12bd4cc41fe8604
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24664
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These two functions were called in exactly one place one right after
the other, and served similar purposes.
This change merges them together, and cleans them up slightly. It also
removes checks for FullSystem, since those functions are only called
in full system to begin with.
Change-Id: I214f7d2d3f88960dccb5895c1241f61cd78716a8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24904
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The call to initCPU was moved into initState in the base CPU class
since it should only really be called when starting a simulation
fresh. Otherwise checkpointed state will be loaded over the state of
the CPU anyway, so there's no reason to set up anything else.
Unfortunately that made it possible for the System level initialization
and the CPU initialization to happen out of order, effectively letting
initCPU clobber the state the System might have set up to prepare for
executing a kernel for instance.
To work around that issue, the call was moved to init which would
necessarily happen before initState, restoring the original ordering.
This change moves the change *back* into initState, but of the System
class instead of the CPU class. This makes it possible to guarantee
that OS initialization happens after initCPU since that's also done
by System subclasses, and they control when they call initCPU of the
base class.
This also slightly simmplifies when initCPU is called since we
shouldn't need to check whether a context is switched out or not. If
it's registered with the System object, then it should be in a
currently swapped in CPU.
This also puts the initCPU and startupCPU calls right next to each
other. A future change will take advantage of that and merge the
calls together.
Also, because there are already ISA specific subclasses of System
which already have specialized versions of initState, we should be
able to move the code in initCPU and startupCPU directly into those
subclasses. That will give those subclasses more flexibilty if, for
instance, they want all CPUs to start running in the BIOS like they
would on a real system, or if they want only the BSP to be active
as if the BIOS had already paused the APs before passing control to
a bootloader or OS.
This will also remove another two TheISA:: style functions, reducing
the number of global dependencies on a single ISA.
Change-Id: Ic56924660a5b575a07844a198f69a0e7fa212b52
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24903
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
