To limit the number of license slots used by SCons when building fast
model components, the fastmodel SConscript set up a group of nodes
which are attached to each simgen run using the SCons SideEffect
method using one of the library files it generates.
To create each unique node, the SCons Value() method was used, passing
it the counter for the loop. In at least version 4 of SCons, what this
ended up doing was setting that library file as a source for each of
the Value() nodes it corresponds to.
That doesn't *seem* like a problem, but then when creating config
include files, files which expose SCons configuration values to C++,
they also create Value() nodes using the value of the config variable.
In cases where that variable is boolean, the value might be 0 or 1.
The result was that the config header depended on Value(0) (for
instance), and then Value(0) depended on a collection of static library
files.
When scons tried to determine whether the config file was up to date,
it tried to check if if its sources had changed. It would check
Value(0), and then Value(0) would try to compute a checksum for its own
source. To do that, it seems to assume that the value can be
interpreted as a string and tries to decode it as utf8. Since the
library is a binary file, that would fail and break the build with a
cryptic message from within the guts of SCons.
To address this, this change replaces the loop index with a call to
object(). Each instance created in that way will be different from
every other, and there will be no way (purposefully or otherwise) to
create a collision with it when creating Value() nodes for some other
purpose.
Change-Id: I56bc842ae66b8cb36d3dcbc25796b708254d6982
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/38617
Reviewed-by: Yu-hsin Wang <yuhsingw@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This register is used since the Linux kernel 5.6 aarch64 boot.
This register indicates CPU capabilities in aarch32 mode, and it has the
same value as the aarch32 ID_ISAR6 miscregister, which is also added.
The capability values of those registers are analogous to those present in
aarch64 accessible ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 and ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1, which refer to
aarch64 capabilities however, and were already implemented before this
commit.
The arm architecture document clarifies that reads to this system register
location before it had been defined should return 0, but we were faulting
instead:
> Prior to the introduction of the features described by this register,
this register was unnamed and reserved, RES0 from EL1, EL2, and EL3.
Change-Id: I70e99536dc98925e88233fd4c6887bbcdd5d87dc
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/30935
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This will prevent checkpoints from breaking on every miscreg addition.
Before this commit, miscregs were stored as an array:
[system.cpu.isa]
miscRegs=965 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17895697 ...
and after this commit they are stored as a map:
[system.cpu.isa]
[system.cpu.isa.miscRegs]
cpsr=965
spsr=0
spsr_fiq=0
spsr_irq=0
spsr_svc=0
spsr_mon=0
spsr_abt=0
spsr_hyp=0
spsr_und=0
elr_hyp=0
fpsid=0
fpscr=0
mvfr1=17895697
JIRA: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-661
Change-Id: I49999c7206bd9ac1cfb81297d45c8117ff8ae675
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/36116
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Cooper <richard.cooper@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
There were accessors for reading these indexes, but they were not
consistently used. This change makes them private to StaticInst, and
changes places that were accessing them directly to instead use the
accessors. New accessors are added for code generated by the ISA parser
and some ARM code to set the indexes without accessing them directly.
By forcing these values to be behind accessors, it will be much simpler
to change how those values are stored and retrieved.
Change-Id: Icca80023d7f89e29504fac6b194881f88aedeec2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/36875
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Several TLB invalidation instructions rely on VMID matching. This is
only applicable is EL2 is implemented and enabled in the current state.
The code prior to this patch was making the now invalid assumption that
we shouldn't consider the VMID if we are doing a secure lookup. This is
because in the past if we were in secure mode we were sure EL2 was not
enabled.
This is fishy and not valid anymore anyway after the introduction of
secure EL2.
Change-Id: I9a1368f8ed19279ed3c4b2da9fcdf0db799bc514
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35242
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The event in KVM x86 SE mode plays double duty, triggering a system call
or a page fault depending on where it's called from (the system call
handler vs page fault handler).
This means we can eliminate the page fault gem5 op and the
pseudo_inst.hh switching header file.
This change touches a lot of things, but there wasn't really a good
place to split it up which still made sense and was consistent and
functional.
Change-Id: Ic414829917bcbd421893aa6c89d78273e4926b78
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/34165
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Duțu <alexandru.dutu@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The TLBIALL op in gem5 was designed after the AArch32 TLBIALL instruction.
and was reused by the TLBI ALLEL1, ALLE2, ALLE3 logic.
This is not correct for the following reasons:
- TLBI ALLEx invalidates regardless of the VMID
- TLBI ALLEx (AArch64) is "target regime" oriented, whereas TLBIALL
(AArch32) is "current regime" oriented
TLBIALL has a different behaviour depending on the current exception
level: if issued at EL1 it will invalidate stage1 translations only; if
at EL2, it will invalidate stage2 translations as well.
TLBI ALLEx is more standard; every TLBI ALLE1 will invalidate stage1 and
stage2 translations. This is because the instruction is not executable
from the guest (EL1)
So for TLBIALL the condition for stage2 forwarding will be:
if (!isStage2 && isHyp) {
Whereas for TLBI ALLEx will be:
if (!isStage2 && target_el == EL1) {
Change-Id: I282f2cfaecbfc883e173770e5d2578b41055bb7a
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35241
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The create() method on Params structs usually instantiate SimObjects
using a constructor which takes the Params struct as a parameter
somehow. There has been a lot of needless variation in how that was
done, making it annoying to pass Params down to base classes. Some of
the different forms were:
const Params &
Params &
Params *
const Params *
Params const*
This change goes through and fixes up every constructor and every
create() method to use the const Params & form. We use a reference
because the Params struct should never be null. We use const because
neither the create method nor the consuming object should modify the
record of the parameters as they came in from the config. That would
make consuming them not idempotent, and make it impossible to tell what
the actual simulation configuration was since it would change from any
user visible form (config script, config.ini, dot pdf output).
Change-Id: I77453cba52fdcfd5f4eec92dfb0bddb5a9945f31
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35938
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
There has been some testing of this wrapper, but some components are
missing. It's not currently possible to read or set Misc registers,
64 bit integer registers, flattened integer registers, or vector
registers. In some cases that's because no mapping from gem5 indexes
to IRIS resource names has been set up, but in some cases, since R52
is 32 bit, no mapping *can* be set up, and we need to figure out what
to do with requests for 64 bit only state.
Change-Id: I2d650a7c1765b39f25058727502c96e6de5aa26b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35635
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
