This allows us to set a high number of threads for gem5 compilation
tasks, and a lower number of threads for running gem5. The latter is
more memory intensive and, therefore, we cannot always use the maximum
number of threads in a system.
Change-Id: I699d9f74b21d31841bf31e3589d323b007cb4601
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/53483
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Currently, the installation instructions are for installing
SST-core and SST-elements version 11.0.0. This change updates
instructions to the current SST-core and SST-element version,
11.1.0.
This change also reflects that manually downloading the
`bbl-busybox-boot-exit` is no longer necessary as the example
gem5 config will download automatically.
Change-Id: I616ca38316213dcbd71b6eab121b5ac89eed1962
Signed-off-by: Hoa Nguyen <hoanguyen@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/53463
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This method is responsible for comparing gem5's state against the state
of the real process. When checking the value of NPC, it accessed the
value of nnpc() by calling pc.nnpc(), but did not actually update regVal
with it, so the comparison was between the value from the real process
and npc().
It's mildly confusing that nnpc is compared against npc, and npc against
pc, but that's because of what the state looks like in the real process
when single stepping through it with ptrace.
You can actually see where this bug was introduced if you look at the
change which created the PCState types originally. There, you can see
how regVal was set using a method of the ThreadContext, but after that
change the value is only accessed and not actually used.
Change-Id: I0f0101db5f807640b8d25fef6448081d9cfa0213
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/53363
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Boris Shingarov <shingarov@labware.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This was originally intended to make it more efficient to get the
microPC without making a copy of the entire PCState object to return.
Now that the PCState is returned through a pointer without a copy and
the microPC can be accessed with an inline accessor, we don't need to
create a special accessor for it.
Change-Id: I1d354dfca6be5d954e147f23dc9d27917b379bf2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52061
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
As described in a comment in the base KVM CPU, there needs to be a way
to set the next PC of a PCState object to the actual current PC. Since
this is the only place that sort of operation is needed and it's a bit
of a hack to get around a quirk of calling pseudo instructions in a KVM
CPU, we can support it by adding a virtual method for it which is
implemented by the ISA specific subclasses of the KVM CPU.
Change-Id: Idf390e9c4ffa7398cd08e76846c61cb6da754dce
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52059
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
The default value of IPredEntry::tag is 0, and if we just blindly
compare the tag we're looking for against this value, we might run into
cases where we match against an uninitialized IPredEntry. In that case,
IPredEntry::target has not been initialized, and if we try to use it in
lookup(...) we'll dereference nullptr and segfault.
To avoid that, we can just add one additional check that makes sure that
not only does the tag of the IPredEntry match, but also that the value
of target is not null, and so the IPredEntry *actually* has tag 0 and
isn't just uninitialized.
Change-Id: I892d0df7c00a0a4cd3ca215fe3a7586ddbca9395
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/53403
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Without this verbose flag, there is no information output on the tests
currently running. Output is only given on the pass/fail status of a
test after completion. This is unhelpful if the tests fail due to a
timeout (e.g., a test has stalled).
The '-vv' verbose flags sets up the TestLib package to output when a
test has started execution. This information can help in figuring out
which test caused a timeout event to occur.
Change-Id: I14e6752d40a7c8d7189211584073ba79c88ed7d5
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/53305
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Enable a gem5 system to be an SST::Component.
This change includes,
- SST::gem5Component: responsible for,
- initializing the Python environment for gem5
- instantiating gem5 SimObjects
- connecting SST::SSTResponderSubComponent to
gem5::OutgoingRequestBridge
- hanlding the gem5 event queue (no thread-synchronization)
- handling executing gem5 events
- SST::SSTResponderSubComponent: responsible for,
- receiving gem5 requests and sending the requests to
memory.
- sending responses to the corresponding
gem5::OutgoingRequestBridge.
- SST::SSTResponder: owned by SSTResponderSubComponent, the
actual actor that sends gem5's requests to memory.
- gem5::OutgoingRequestBridge: receives the requests from
gem5 and sends them to SST. This SimObject allows the initialization
requests to be cached and the receiver could query the
initialization data later on.
- gem5::SSTResponderInterface: the interface specifying how SST
communicates with gem5.
- A working example of a gem5/SST setup.
More information is available at ext/sst/README.md.
For installation instructions, please refer to ext/sst/INSTALL.md.
Change-Id: I6b81260ef825415bcfe72b8a078854f4c94de782
Signed-off-by: Hoa Nguyen <hoanguyen@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/50468
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The "Regs" structure in the DynInst class was using placement new to
allocate register arrays in a dynamically allocated blob which can be
resized based on the number of source and destination registers.
Unfortunately, it was assumed that the alignment of the components of
that structure would work out because they were ordered from largest to
smallest, which should imply largest alignment to smallest.
This change instead uses an overloaded new operator to allocate extra
memory for the DynInst itself, and then initialize arrays within that
extra space. The DynInst class then gets pointers to the arrays so it
can access them. This has the benefit that only one chunk of memory is
allocated, instead of one for the DynInst and then a second for the
arrays.
Also, this new version uses the alignof operator to figure out what
alignment is needed for each array, which should avoid any undefined
behavior. The new-ing, initialization, destructing, and delete-ing are
also more carefully orchestrated. Hopefully one or both of these will
squash potential memory management bugs.
Change-Id: Id2fa090b53909f14a8cb39801e9930d4608e42f7
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52485
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This changeset adds CHI support in the components library. Currently,
only a very simple one level protocol is implemented, but hopefully this
design will be able to scale to other more complex hierarchies.
I've tested this with RISC-V with 1 and 4 cores and with x86 with 1
core. Since we don't have an Arm-compatible board, I haven't tested with
ARM. Note that x86 with more than 1 core boots most of the way, but it
hangs during systemd (the kernel comes up completely).
Change-Id: I56953238c6b0ca5ac754b103a1b6ec05a85a0af5
Signed-off-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52463
Reviewed-by: Tiago Mück <tiago.muck@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Use the BaseISA::newPCState(Addr) method instead, so that we don't need
to know how to build PCState objects for the given ISA.
Because the pcState() accessor still takes a const reference to a
PCState, we still need to use the TheISA::PCState type to call it. In
the future this will also take a PCStatePtr, so that use will go away.
Change-Id: I8f2f66b58c342e8c455d438047857c0119566b2b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52054
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
There are a few places where TheISA::PCState is still necessary,
specifically when checking if a PC is branching, and also when getting
the nextInstAddr.
It's likely that checking if a PC is branching will become part of the
base PCState interface, but nextInstAddr will likely be removed from the
ThreadContext, ExecContext, etc, interfaces, and then removed from the
interfaces in the O3 which doesn't seem to use them internally.
Change-Id: I499f31d569b9b0c665a745caf612d1e96babf37a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52051
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
The minor CPU was using a PCState object both to track redirects when
taking a branch, etc, and to track where to fetch a line of memory from.
It would need to create a new PCState object, or at least update the
existing one, whenever it needed to advance to the next line.
This is problematic since it means the minor CPU needs to know how to
create or set a PCState object, and since it by necessity only
understands the most basic aspect of a PCState, what the address is, it
can only set that, with all the other potential attributes staying at
their old values or getting set to some default.
Instead, this change separates the two. There is now a PC which is used
for redirects which the later stages will only pick up if there is a
change in "sequence", the same behavior as before. This PC will only
ever be set when changing sequence, and will otherwise not be
meaningful/useful.
There is also now a separate fetch address which is what the fetch stage
uses to get new lines. This was all the PC value that was artificially
updated was used for anyway.
Change-Id: Ia64bbe21e980566ae77786999689c9c8a94e9378
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52048
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: ZHENGRONG WANG <seanyukigeek@gmail.com>
Maintainer: ZHENGRONG WANG <seanyukigeek@gmail.com>
By using a PCStateBase pointer or reference, we can (mostly) avoid
having to know what the ISA specific PState class is, letting the ISA
specific instruction classes cast to the type they need internally.
There are a couple minor places where we need to do those casts outside
of ISA specific types, one in the generic NopStaticInstPtr class, and a
few in generic faults.
Right now, we'll just use the TheISA::PCState type in those isolated
spots (sometimes hidden by auto), and deal with it later, possibly
with a virtual "advance" method of some sort.
Change-Id: I774c67dc648a85556230f601e087211b3d5630a9
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52043
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Most of the time, the type pointed to by a PCState pointer or reference
will be the same as all the others, if not nullptr.
This change adds a set of "set" functions which assume that the
underlying type of each pointer or reference are the same, and handles
casting, copying things over, creating a new copy, etc, for you. It uses
a new "update" virtual method on PCState subclasses which casts the
source to the same type as the destination and copies values over.
Note that the "set" function doesn't actually verify that the two types
are the same, just like the overloaded ==, != and << operators. In the
future, those checks can be added for debugging purposes, probably
guarded by a configuration variable which can be toggled on or off to
get better performance or more thorough error checking.
The main advantage of these wrappers are that they allows consistent
semantics whether your moving a value from a pointer, or from a yet
unconverted PCState subclass, or vice versa, which will be particularly
helpful while transitioning between using raw PCState instances and
using primarily pointers and references.
This change also adds wrappers which handle std::unique_ptr, which makes
it easier to use them as arguments to these functions. Otherwise, if the
std::unique_ptr is a temporary value, using the return value of .get()
will let the std::unique_ptr go out of scope, making it delete the data
pointed to by the returned pointed. By keeping the std::unique_ptr
around on the stack, that prevents it from going out of scope.
Change-Id: I2c737b08e0590a2c46e212a7b9efa543bdb81ad3
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52041
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
This method is the seed which creates a new PCState object of the
appropriate type. It can be used to initialize PCStateBase *s so that they
always point to something valid and can be manipulated without having to
first check if there's something there, as opposed to the alternative
where a pointer might be null until it's first pointed at something.
Change-Id: If06ee633846603acbfd2432f3d8bac6746a8b729
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52040
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
