Several TLB invalidation instructions rely on VMID matching. This is
only applicable is EL2 is implemented and enabled in the current state.
The code prior to this patch was making the now invalid assumption that
we shouldn't consider the VMID if we are doing a secure lookup. This is
because in the past if we were in secure mode we were sure EL2 was not
enabled.
This is fishy and not valid anymore anyway after the introduction of
secure EL2.
Change-Id: I9a1368f8ed19279ed3c4b2da9fcdf0db799bc514
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35242
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This change is useful when using custom simulation scripts that do not
rely on configs/common/Options.py.
Without this change, the custom script always needed to provide some
value for cache sizes and HW prefetchers configuration; with this change
it is possible to provide no value and use what is defined in the core
configuration as default.
Change-Id: Id0e807c3fa224180d682f366c7307941bab8ce59
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/36776
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This gets rid of the requirement to only modify one byte register at a
time, and builds some structure around individual DMA channels.
The one small feature of the i8237 that was implemented is still
implemented, but now with a method of the i8237.
Change-Id: Ibc2b2d75f2a3b860da3f28ae649c6f1a099bdf7d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/36815
Reviewed-by: Matthew Poremba <matthew.poremba@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This verifies that the slightly more complex --addr command line option
behaves as expected.
Also, like the inst and semi call type unit tests, it will either
attempt to successfully perform a call to the "sum" m5 op if it's told
it's running under gem5, or it will attempt to catch itself failing to
run that command by using mprotect to block its access to the mmap-ed
region and then looks at the siginfo_t to make sure the attempted access
was to the right place, etc.
It also will attempt to verify the details of the mmap if possible by
looking up information about its own mmap-ings in /proc. If the file it
would expect to find the mappings in doesn't exist, it prints a warning
and gives up. If it does, it looks through it to find the line
corresponding to the m5 ops, and then checks some details of the mapping
like its size and its offset in the target file. The offset would
correspond to the physical address if using the real /dev/mem.
Change-Id: Icc14cd9ac02eae93c56f1f2aa78fd67d8540a2f2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/27751
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Modern libraries such as ROCm, MPI, and libnuma use files in Linux'
sysfs to determine the system topology such as number of CPUs, cache
size, cache associativity, etc. If Linux does not recognize the vendor
string returned by CPUID in x86 it will do a generic initialization
which does not include creating these files. In the case of ROCm
(specifically ROCt) this causes failures when getting device properties.
This can be solved by setting the vendor string to, for example,
AuthenticAMD (as qemu does) so that Linux will create the relevant sysfs
files. Unfortunately, simply changing the string in cpuid.cc to
AuthenticAMD causes simulation slowdown and may not be desirable to all
users. This change creates a parameter, defaulting to M5 Simulator as it
currently is, which can be set in python configuration files to change
the vendor string. Example of how to configure this is:
for i in range(len(self.cpus)):
for j in range(len(self.cpus[i].isa)):
self.cpus[i].isa[j].vendor_string = "AuthenticAMD"
Change-Id: I8de26d5a145867fa23518718a799dd96b5b9bffa
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/36156
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
A memory willing to autogenerate child nodes can do that directly in
the generateDeviceTree method. However sometimes portions of memory
(child nodes) are tagged for specific applications. Hardcoding the
child node in the parent memory class is not flexible, so we delegate
this to the application model, which is registering the generator
helper via the ParentMem interface
JIRA: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-768
Change-Id: I5fa5bac0decf5399dbaa3804569998dc5e6d7bc0
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/34376
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Cooper <richard.cooper@arm.com>
The event in KVM x86 SE mode plays double duty, triggering a system call
or a page fault depending on where it's called from (the system call
handler vs page fault handler).
This means we can eliminate the page fault gem5 op and the
pseudo_inst.hh switching header file.
This change touches a lot of things, but there wasn't really a good
place to split it up which still made sense and was consistent and
functional.
Change-Id: Ic414829917bcbd421893aa6c89d78273e4926b78
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/34165
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Duțu <alexandru.dutu@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The *vast* majority of SimObjects use the standard boilerplate version
of their Params::create() method which just returns new
ClassName(*this); Rather than force every class to define this method,
or annoy and frustrate users who forget and then get linker errors, this
change automates the default while leaving the possibility of defining a
custom create() method for non-default cases.
The situations this mechanism handles can be first broken down by
whether the SimObject class has a constructor of the normal form, ie one
that takes a const Params reference as its only parameter.
If no, then no default create() implementation is defined, and one
*must* be defined by the user.
If yes, then a default create() implementation is defined as a weak
symbol. If the user still wants to define their own create method for
some reason, perhaps to add debugging info, to keep track of instances
in c++, etc., then they can and it will override the weak symbol and
take precedence.
The way this is implemented is not straightforward. A set of classes are
defined which use SFINAE which either map in the real Params type or a
dummy based on whether the normal constructor exists in the SimObject
class. Then those classes are used to define *a* create method.
Depending on how the SFINAE works out, that will either be *the* create
method on the real Params struct, or a create method on a dummy class
set up to just absorb the definition and then go away. In either case the
create() method is a weak symbol, but in the dummy case it
doesn't/shouldn't matter.
Annoyingly the compiler insists that the weak symbol be visible. While
that makes total sense normally, we don't actually care what happens to
the weak symbol if it's attached to the dummy class. Unfortunately that
means we need to make the dummy class globally visible, although we put
it in a namespace to keep it from colliding with anything useful.
Change-Id: I3767a8dc8dc03665a72d5e8c294550d96466f741
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35942
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Cooper <richard.cooper@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This is a way to send a very generic poke to the workload so it can do
something. It's up to the workload to know what information to look for
to interpret an event, such as what PC it came from, what register
values are, or the context of the workload itself (is this SE mode? which
OS is running?).
Change-Id: Ifa4bdf3b5c5a934338c50600747d0b65f4b5eb2b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/34162
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These tables take up a lot of space and obscure what's going on in the
file around them. This change moves them into their own files (one for
32 bit and one for 64 bit). It also moves the x86 local definitions of
some system calls into their own file, and creates a SConscript file for
the linux subdirectory.
Change-Id: Ib0978005783b41789ea59695ad95b0336f6353eb
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/34160
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
In SPARC and SE mode, system calls are triggered by a trap exception
with the appropriate trap number, and then a handler within the Workload
(formerly the Process) object recognizes the trap number and triggers
the system call.
For Linux, this special handling happens in the Linux specific Workload,
and other types of traps are passed through to the base SPARC SE
Workload class. For Solaris however, no special handling is implemented.
That means that it's actually impossible for a Solaris SE mode program
to actually trigger a system call, and so while there is some code
written for Solaris SE mode, this feature does not actually work at all.
Also, while it's relatively easy to build binaries for Linux on various
architectures using, for instance, the crosstool-ng configs in util/,
there is no ready made option that I could find for building a SPARC
Solaris cross compiler which would run on x86 linux.
Given that the support that exists isn't actually hooked up properly,
SPARC is not one of the most popular ISAs within gem5, Solaris is not a
widely used operating system, we have (to my knowledge) no test binary
to run, and setting up a cross compiler would be non-trivial, it makes
the most sense to me to remove this support.
Change-Id: I896b5abc4bf337bd4e4c06c49de7111a3b2b784c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/33996
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These files are nominally not tied to the X86ISA, but in reality they
are because they reach into the GPU TLB, which is defined unchangeably in
the X86ISA namespaces, and uses data structures within it. Rather than try
to pretend that these structures are generic, we'll instead just use X86ISA
instead of TheISA. If this really does become generic in the future, a
base class with the ISA agnostic essentials defined in it can be used
instead, and the ISA specific TLBs can defined their own derived class
which has whatever else they need. Really the compute unit shouldn't be
communicating with the TLB using sender state since those are supposed
to be little notes for the sender to keep with a transaction, not for
communicating between entities across a port.
Change-Id: Ie6573396f6c77a9a02194f5f4595eefa45d6d66b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/34174
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This is still triggered by the generic mechanism that tries out all
paths to go from an object file to a process. That's not entirely
necessary since the only loader that should be used when using the
X86ISA::EmuLinux workload is the one it provides, but the rest of gem5
isn't ready for that change yet.
This removes the last lingering reason to keep around the
arch/x86/linux/process.(hh|cc) files, so they have been deleted.
Change-Id: I425b95c9c730f31291790d63bc842e2c0092960d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/33904
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Duțu <alexandru.dutu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
