The workload would have a better idea of what it's endianness is than
the system object that holds it. This is the first step towards getting
rid of the getByteOrder method on the system object, which currently
checks TARGET_ISA to determine what the default endianness should be.
If it makes sense for a Workload, it could determine the endianness
dynamically by, for instance, reading it out of a binary image before
putting it into memory.
This does assume that the workload has a consistent endianness
throughout which may not be true, but this is not a new assumption.
Also, mark the SEWorkload SimObject class as "abstract", since it isn't
useful until they get subclassed by some arch specific version.
Change-Id: I8d4ba8382f22236a81f9738cc3506cdb97bdbfb2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/52104
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
In C, to refer to a type without a struct or enum tag on the type, you
need to typedef it like this:
typedef struct
{
} Foo;
Foo foo;
In C++, this is unnecessary:
struct Foo
{
};
Foo foo;
Remove all of the first form in C++ files and replace them with the
second form.
Change-Id: I37cc0d63b2777466dc6cc51eb5a3201de2e2cf43
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/46199
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Apply the gem5 namespace to the codebase.
Some anonymous namespaces could theoretically be removed,
but since this change's main goal was to keep conflicts
at a minimum, it was decided not to modify much the
general shape of the files.
A few missing comments of the form "// namespace X" that
occurred before the newly added "} // namespace gem5"
have been added for consistency.
std out should not be included in the gem5 namespace, so
they weren't.
ProtoMessage has not been included in the gem5 namespace,
since I'm not familiar with how proto works.
Regarding the SystemC files, although they belong to gem5,
they actually perform integration between gem5 and SystemC;
therefore, it deserved its own separate namespace.
Files that are automatically generated have been included
in the gem5 namespace.
The .isa files currently are limited to a single namespace.
This limitation should be later removed to make it easier
to accomodate a better API.
Regarding the files in util, gem5:: was prepended where
suitable. Notice that this patch was tested as much as
possible given that most of these were already not
previously compiling.
Change-Id: Ia53d404ec79c46edaa98f654e23bc3b0e179fe2d
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/46323
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Poremba <matthew.poremba@amd.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These were not caught by the previous patches because
the grep used ignored:
- anonymous structures
(e.g., "struct {")
- opening braces without leading spaces
(e.g., "struct Name{"),
- weird chars in auto-generation files
(e.g., "struct $name {").
- extra characters after the opening brace.
(e.g., "struct Name { // Comment")
- typedefs (note that this is not caught by the verifier)
(e.g., "typedef struct Name {")
Most of this has been fixed be grepping structures
with the following regex:
grep -nrE --exclude-dir=systemc \
"^ *(typedef)* *(struct|class|enum|union) [^{]*{$" src/
The following makes sure that "struct{" is captured:
grep -nrE --exclude-dir=systemc \
"^ *(struct|class|enum|union){" src/
To find cases that contain a comment after the
opening brace:
grep -nrE --exclude-dir=systemc \
"^ *(struct|class|enum|union)[^{]*{\s*//" src/
Change-Id: I9f822bed628d13b1a09ccd6059373aff63a8d7bd
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/43505
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The systemc dir was not included in this fix.
First it was identified that there were only occurrences
at 0, 1, 2 and 3 levels of indentation (and a single
occurrence of 2 and 3 spaces), using:
grep -nrE --exclude-dir=systemc \
"^ *struct [A-Za-z].* {$" src/
Then the following commands were run to replace:
<indent level>struct X ... {
by:
<indent level>struct X ...
<indent level>{
Level 0:
grep -nrl --exclude-dir=systemc
"^struct [A-Za-z].* {$" src/ | \
xargs sed -Ei \
's/^struct ([A-Za-z].*) \{$/struct \1\n\{/g'
Level 1:
grep -nrl --exclude-dir=systemc \
"^ struct [A-Za-z].* {$" src/ | \
xargs sed -Ei \
's/^ struct ([A-Za-z].*) \{$/ struct \1\n \{/g'
and so on.
Change-Id: I362ef58c86912dabdd272c7debb8d25d587cd455
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/39017
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The patch is using the newly defined PARAMS macro to replace
custom params() getters in derived class.
The patch is also removing redundant _params:
Instead of creating yet another _params field, SimObject descendants
should use params() to expose the real type of SimObject::_params they
already have.
Change-Id: I43394cebb9661fe747bdbb332236f0f0181b3dba
Signed-off-by: Alexander Klimov <Alexander.Klimov@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/39900
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The create() method on Params structs usually instantiate SimObjects
using a constructor which takes the Params struct as a parameter
somehow. There has been a lot of needless variation in how that was
done, making it annoying to pass Params down to base classes. Some of
the different forms were:
const Params &
Params &
Params *
const Params *
Params const*
This change goes through and fixes up every constructor and every
create() method to use the const Params & form. We use a reference
because the Params struct should never be null. We use const because
neither the create method nor the consuming object should modify the
record of the parameters as they came in from the config. That would
make consuming them not idempotent, and make it impossible to tell what
the actual simulation configuration was since it would change from any
user visible form (config script, config.ini, dot pdf output).
Change-Id: I77453cba52fdcfd5f4eec92dfb0bddb5a9945f31
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35938
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The components in base/loader were moved into a namespace called
Loader. This will make it easier to add loader components with fairly
short natural names which don't invite name collisions.
gem5 should use namespaces more in general for that reason and to make
it easier to write independent components without having to worry about
name collisions being added in the future.
Unfortunately this namespace has the same name as a class used to load
an object file into a process object. These names can be disambiguated
because the Process loader is inside the Process scope and the Loader
namespace is at global scope, but it's still confusing to read.
Fortunately, this shouldn't last for very long since the responsibility
for loading Processes is going to move to a fake OS object which will
expect to load a particular type of Process, for instance, fake 64 bit
x86 linux will load either 32 or 64 bit x86 processes.
That means that the capability to feed any binary that matches the
current build into gem5 and have gem5 figure out what to do with it
will likely be going away in the future. That's likely for the best,
since it will force users to be more explicit about what they're trying
to do, ie what OS they want to try to load a given binary, and also
will prevent loading two or more Processes which are for different OSes
to the same system, something that's possible today as far as I know
since there are no consistency checks.
Change-Id: Iea0012e98f39f5e20a7c351b78cdff9401f5e326
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24783
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This is specialized per arch, and the Workload class is the only thing
actually using it. It doesn't make any sense to dispatch those calls
over to the System object, especially since that was, in most cases,
the only reason an ISA specific system class even still existed.
After this change, only ARM still has an architecture specific System
class.
Change-Id: I81b6c4db14b612bff8840157cfc56393370095e2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24287
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
When handling a system call, external code would call Process::syscall
which would extract the syscall number, that would call the base
class' doSyscall method, that would call into the subclass' getDesc
to get the appropriate descriptor, and then doSyscall would check
that a syscall was found and call into it.
Instead, we can just make the SyscallDescTable optionally check for
missing syscalls (in case we want to check multiple tables), and
make syscall look up the appropriate descriptor and call it. The base
implementation of syscall would then do the only bit of doSyscall that
is no longer being handled, incrementing the numSyscalls stat.
Change-Id: If102c156830ed2997d177dc6937cc85dddadf3f9
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24119
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Tested-by: Gem5 Cloud Project GCB service account <345032938727@cloudbuild.gserviceaccount.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Also add the syscall number into the SyscallDesc class.
The common table structure is basically just a map that extracts its
key value from the SyscallDesc class using a new num() accessor. By
using a map instead of an array (like RISCV was already doing), it's
easy to support gaps of arbitrary size and non-zero offsets of groups
of system calls without lots of filler or additional logic. This
simplified the ARM system call tables in particular which had a lot
of filler entries.
Also, both the 32 and 64 bit ARM syscall tables had entries for a
syscall at 123456 which was the "Angel SWI system call". This value
is actually the immediate constant passed to the SWI system call
instruction and is not interpreted as the system call number in linux.
This constant can be intercepted by hardware or a simulator to, for
instance, implement ARM semihosting.
Also, that constant in combination with the SWI instruction is only
used for semihosting in 32 bit ARM mode, not in 64 bit mode or in
thumb.
Since checking for that system call number was very likely a mistake
from misinterpreting how the semihosting calls work, this change
drops those checks.
Change-Id: I9b2a902d7326791449cf0e1b98e932dcadba54f7
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24117
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
This class read arguments using the arch specific getArgument function
and then presented the arguments as an array. The problem with that
approach is that it's not possible to tell where different arguments
are without knowing the types of previous arguments, and not all
arguments can be simply represented as a native sized integer.
This class has been phased out and is no longer needed.
Change-Id: Ibb4c529fe8c51fd0ae15ed3b6ea30543ad9c23e0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24115
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
This function is no longer used anywhere in gem5.
Small helper functions which had been put alongside vtophys on ARM and
RISCV were also moved into src/arch/arm/remote_gdb.cc and
src/arch/power/pagetable.hh, the only places they were used.
Change-Id: Iba72f6c4b797a35a785a5bb781d602c943541fa7
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/26234
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
By using braced initializer lists and dropping the default
unimplementedFunc implementation function, the SyscallDesc tables
become a lot less crowded, and it's now very obvious which syscalls
are implemented just by quickly visually scanning the table.
This will also make it a lot easier to change the underlying type
stored in the table without having to adjust all of the instances
within them.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I7821de74812e1c02ca4550fc9c46cc2188cf1bd0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23189
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The logic that determines which syscall to call was built into the
implementation of faults/exceptions or even into the instruction
decoder, but that logic can depend on what OS is being used, and
sometimes even what version, for example 32bit vs. 64bit.
This change pushes that logic up into the Process objects since those
already handle a lot of the aspects of emulating the guest OS. Instead,
the ISA or fault implementations just notify the rest of the system
that a nebulous syscall has happened, and that gets propogated upward
until the process does something with it. That's very analogous to how
a system call would work on a real machine.
When a system call happens, the low level component which detects that
should call tc->syscall(&fault), where tc is the relevant thread (or
execution) context, and fault is a Fault which can ultimately be set
by the system call implementation.
The TC implementor (probably a CPU) will then have a chance to do
whatever it needs to to handle a system call. Currently only O3 does
anything special here. That implementor will end up calling the
Process's syscall() method.
Once in Process::syscall, the process object will use it's contextual
knowledge to determine what system call is being requested. It then
calls Process::doSyscall with the right syscall number, where doSyscall
centralizes the common mechanism for actually retrieving and calling
into the system call implementation.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I937ec1ef0576142c2a182ff33ca508d77ad0e7a1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23176
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
This abstraction will allow scheduling PCEvents for a particular
ThreadContext, all contexts on a CPU, all contexts in a system, etc.,
and delegates scheduling and removing events to each particular scope.
Right now the PCEventQueue is the only implementor of the PCEventSCope
interface.
Change-Id: I8fb62931511136229915c2e19d36aae7ffdec9df
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22099
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
