These classes are all basically empty now that Alpha has been deleted,
except in cases where the arch versions had copied versions of the Alpha
code.
This change pulls all the generic logic out of the arch versions, making
the arch versions much simpler and making it clearer what the core
functionality of the class is, and what parts are architecture specific
details.
In the future, the way the StackTrace class is instantiated should be
delegated to the Workload class so that ISA agnostic code doesn't need
to know about a particular ISA's StackTrace class, and so that
StackTrace logic can, at least theoretically, be specialized for a
particular workload. The way a stack trace is collected could vary from
OS to OS, for example.
Change-Id: Id8108f94e9fe8baf9b4056f2b6404571e9fa52f1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/30961
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The ThreadContext can be used to access the cpu if needed, and is a
more representative interface to various pieces of state than the CPU
itself. Also convert some of the methods in Interupts to use the
locally stored ThreadContext pointer instead of taking one as an
argument. This makes calling those methods simpler and less error
prone.
Change-Id: I740bd99f92e54e052a618a4ae2927ea1c4ece193
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/28988
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The System class has a few different arrays of values which each
correspond to a thread of execution based on their position. This
change collects them together into a single class to make managing them
easier and less error prone. It also collects methods for manipulating
those threads as an API for that class.
This class acts as a collection point for thread based state which the
System class can look into to get at all its state. It also acts as an
interface for interacting with threads for other classes. This forces
external consumers to use the API instead of accessing the individual
arrays which improves consistency.
Change-Id: Idc4575c5a0b56fe75f5c497809ad91c22bfe26cc
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25144
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The SymbolTable class had been tracking symbols as two independent
pieces, a name and an address, and acted as a way to translate between
them. Symbols can be more complex than that, and so this change
encapsulates the information associated with a symbol in a new class.
As a step towards simplifying the API for reading symbols from a
binary, this change also adds a "binding" field to that class so that
global, local and weak symbols can all go in the same table and be
differentiated later as needed. That should unify the current API
which has a method for each symbol type.
While the innards of SymbolTable were being reworked, this change
also makes that class more STL like by adding iterators, and begin
and end methods. These iterate over a new vector which holds all the
symbols. The address and name keyed maps now hold indexes into that
vector instead of the other half of the symbol.
Change-Id: I8084f86fd737f697ec041bac86a635a315fd1194
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24784
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The components in base/loader were moved into a namespace called
Loader. This will make it easier to add loader components with fairly
short natural names which don't invite name collisions.
gem5 should use namespaces more in general for that reason and to make
it easier to write independent components without having to worry about
name collisions being added in the future.
Unfortunately this namespace has the same name as a class used to load
an object file into a process object. These names can be disambiguated
because the Process loader is inside the Process scope and the Loader
namespace is at global scope, but it's still confusing to read.
Fortunately, this shouldn't last for very long since the responsibility
for loading Processes is going to move to a fake OS object which will
expect to load a particular type of Process, for instance, fake 64 bit
x86 linux will load either 32 or 64 bit x86 processes.
That means that the capability to feed any binary that matches the
current build into gem5 and have gem5 figure out what to do with it
will likely be going away in the future. That's likely for the best,
since it will force users to be more explicit about what they're trying
to do, ie what OS they want to try to load a given binary, and also
will prevent loading two or more Processes which are for different OSes
to the same system, something that's possible today as far as I know
since there are no consistency checks.
Change-Id: Iea0012e98f39f5e20a7c351b78cdff9401f5e326
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24783
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Switch over to the new MemState API by specifying memory regions for
stack in each ISA, changing brkFunc to use MemState for heap memory,
and calling the MemState fixup in fixupStackFault (renamed to just
fixupFault).
Change-Id: Ie3559a68ce476daedf1a3f28b168a8fbc7face5e
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25366
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Extend the MemState API to handle tracking dynamically sized memory
regions of a Process class which may be added, moved, removed, or
change in size during the course of simulation. This utilizes the
virtual memory areas (VMA) class to track individual regions and
provides a fixup method to handle physical page allocation in case of
a page fault. This allows for lazy allocation of the stack, heap, and
mmap regions of memory.
Change-Id: I3ef10657e5f8e8f0e328bdf0aa15a27b1dde39bf
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25483
Tested-by: Gem5 Cloud Project GCB service account <345032938727@cloudbuild.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
When handling a system call, external code would call Process::syscall
which would extract the syscall number, that would call the base
class' doSyscall method, that would call into the subclass' getDesc
to get the appropriate descriptor, and then doSyscall would check
that a syscall was found and call into it.
Instead, we can just make the SyscallDescTable optionally check for
missing syscalls (in case we want to check multiple tables), and
make syscall look up the appropriate descriptor and call it. The base
implementation of syscall would then do the only bit of doSyscall that
is no longer being handled, incrementing the numSyscalls stat.
Change-Id: If102c156830ed2997d177dc6937cc85dddadf3f9
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24119
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Tested-by: Gem5 Cloud Project GCB service account <345032938727@cloudbuild.gserviceaccount.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Also add the syscall number into the SyscallDesc class.
The common table structure is basically just a map that extracts its
key value from the SyscallDesc class using a new num() accessor. By
using a map instead of an array (like RISCV was already doing), it's
easy to support gaps of arbitrary size and non-zero offsets of groups
of system calls without lots of filler or additional logic. This
simplified the ARM system call tables in particular which had a lot
of filler entries.
Also, both the 32 and 64 bit ARM syscall tables had entries for a
syscall at 123456 which was the "Angel SWI system call". This value
is actually the immediate constant passed to the SWI system call
instruction and is not interpreted as the system call number in linux.
This constant can be intercepted by hardware or a simulator to, for
instance, implement ARM semihosting.
Also, that constant in combination with the SWI instruction is only
used for semihosting in 32 bit ARM mode, not in 64 bit mode or in
thumb.
Since checking for that system call number was very likely a mistake
from misinterpreting how the semihosting calls work, this change
drops those checks.
Change-Id: I9b2a902d7326791449cf0e1b98e932dcadba54f7
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24117
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
The only functional difference between them was that the SE one might
have optionally fixed up missing translations for demand paging.
This lets us get rid of some code recreating the proxy ports in
setProcessPtr since the SE translating port no longer keeps a copy of
the process object pointer.
Change-Id: Id97df1874f1de138ffd4f2dbb5846dda79d9e4ac
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/26550
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Poremba <matthew.poremba@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
This function is no longer used anywhere in gem5.
Small helper functions which had been put alongside vtophys on ARM and
RISCV were also moved into src/arch/arm/remote_gdb.cc and
src/arch/power/pagetable.hh, the only places they were used.
Change-Id: Iba72f6c4b797a35a785a5bb781d602c943541fa7
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/26234
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The version of vtophys which didn't take a ThreadContext had only been
implemented on Alpha which has since been removed, so this version of
the function was completely unimplemented and never used.
This change also gets rid of the dbg_vtophys which was sometimes
implemented but also never used, and takes the opportunity to fix up
some style problems in some of the vtophys arch files.
Change-Id: Ie10f881f8ce08c7188e71805357cf3264be4c81a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/26224
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The new local access mechanism installs a callback in the request which
implements what the mmapped IPR was doing. That avoids having to have
stubs in ISAs that don't have mmapped IPRs, avoids having to encode
what to do to communicate from the TLB and the mmapped IPR functions,
and gets rid of another global ISA interface function and header files.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I772c2ae2ca3830a4486919ce9804560c0f2d596a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23188
Reviewed-by: Matthew Poremba <matthew.poremba@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
By using braced initializer lists and dropping the default
unimplementedFunc implementation function, the SyscallDesc tables
become a lot less crowded, and it's now very obvious which syscalls
are implemented just by quickly visually scanning the table.
This will also make it a lot easier to change the underlying type
stored in the table without having to adjust all of the instances
within them.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I7821de74812e1c02ca4550fc9c46cc2188cf1bd0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23189
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These don't have anything in them at the moment since making some ISA
methods virtual and not inlined will likely add overhead, specifically
the ones for flattening registers. Some code may need to be rearranged
to minimize that overhead before the ISA objects can be truly put
behind a generic interface.
Change-Id: Ie36a771e977535a7996fdff701ce202bb95c8c58
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/25007
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
These two functions were called in exactly one place one right after
the other, and served similar purposes.
This change merges them together, and cleans them up slightly. It also
removes checks for FullSystem, since those functions are only called
in full system to begin with.
Change-Id: I214f7d2d3f88960dccb5895c1241f61cd78716a8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/24904
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The logic that determines which syscall to call was built into the
implementation of faults/exceptions or even into the instruction
decoder, but that logic can depend on what OS is being used, and
sometimes even what version, for example 32bit vs. 64bit.
This change pushes that logic up into the Process objects since those
already handle a lot of the aspects of emulating the guest OS. Instead,
the ISA or fault implementations just notify the rest of the system
that a nebulous syscall has happened, and that gets propogated upward
until the process does something with it. That's very analogous to how
a system call would work on a real machine.
When a system call happens, the low level component which detects that
should call tc->syscall(&fault), where tc is the relevant thread (or
execution) context, and fault is a Fault which can ultimately be set
by the system call implementation.
The TC implementor (probably a CPU) will then have a chance to do
whatever it needs to to handle a system call. Currently only O3 does
anything special here. That implementor will end up calling the
Process's syscall() method.
Once in Process::syscall, the process object will use it's contextual
knowledge to determine what system call is being requested. It then
calls Process::doSyscall with the right syscall number, where doSyscall
centralizes the common mechanism for actually retrieving and calling
into the system call implementation.
Jira Issue: https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-187
Change-Id: I937ec1ef0576142c2a182ff33ca508d77ad0e7a1
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23176
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
These namespaces were used to set up an environment/context where there
was an implicit guest namespace. This is an issue when there may be
multiple guest endiannesses which might be different. In cases where
we don't know what the guest endianness is, we can't rely on it being
an implicit part of our context since that would be ambiguous. In cases
where we do know, for instance in ISA specific code, we can just use
the endianness specific version that's appropriate for that context.
This also (somewhat) removes the assumption that there is a single
endianness that applies for a particular ISA. Practically speaking this
assumption will probably still stand though, since there would likely
be a non-trivial performance penalty to apply a configurable endianness
instead of a fixed one the compiler can optomize/remove.
Change-Id: I2dff338b58726d724f387388efe32d9233885680
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/22374
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
A memory image can be described by an object file, but an object file
is more than a memory image. Also, it makes sense to manipulate a
memory image to, for instance, change how it's loaded into memory. That
takes on larger implications (relocations, the entry point, symbols,
etc.) when talking about the whole object file, and also modifies
aspects which may not need to change. For instance if an image needs
to be loaded into memory at addresses different from what's in the
object file, but other things like symbols need to stay unmodified.
Change-Id: Ia360405ffb2c1c48e0cc201ac0a0764357996a54
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21466
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
The interpreter is a separate object file, and while it's convenient to
hide loading it in the code which loads the main object file, it breaks
the conceptual abstraction since you only asked it to load the main
object file.
Also, this makes every object file format reimplement the idea of
loading the interpreter. Admittedly only ELF recognizes and sets up
an interpreter, but other formats conceptually could too.
This does move that limitted hypothetical redundancy out of the object
file formats and moves it into the process objects, but I think
conceptually that's where it belongs. It would also probably be pretty
easy to add a method to the base Process class that would handle
loading an image and also the interpreter image.
This change does not (yet) separate reading symbol tables.
Change-Id: I4a165eac599a9bcd30371a162379e833c4cc89b4
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/21465
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brandon Potter <Brandon.Potter@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
