The deprecated attribute didn't work on versions of gcc older than 6,
but we now require version 7 or newer, so we don't need the macro any
more.
This change collapses the two uses of it in sim/aux_vector.hh, and marks
the macro as deprecated by extending the message string in the
underlying deprecated attribute.
Change-Id: I3bc9835ba19ad9534c7725e17a3558a749a94ca5
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/48514
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
The now standard [[nodiscard]] attribute can be used directly instead.
Unfortunately, I can't think of any way to actually mark the old macro
as deprecated, since it still has to expand to an attribute which
applies to the following function.
Change-Id: Icbbe3e3d182d845f289727724fef080722093683
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/48510
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Maintainer: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
The GEM5_DEPRECATED_NAMESPACE macro temporarily declares
a namespace with the deprecated name that prints a
warning message when used. It also make sure that when
the old namespace name is used the new name is referenced.
The GEM5_DEPRECATED_CLASS macro deprecates classes that
were renamed, or moved to different namespaces.
Attributes in namespaces are an issue, though.
- Clang only allows from version 6 on, and only when
using C++17.
- GCC has a bug before version 10 where the deprecated
attribute was not properly recognized in namespaces:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79817
Possible solutions for GCC < 10:
1)
\#define GEM5_DEPRECATED_NAMESPACE() \
namespace gem5 { namespace deprecated { \
auto namespace_##old_namespace = [](){ \
GEM5_DEPRECATED("Please use the new namespace: '" \
\#new_namespace "'") \
int old_namespace; \
return old_namespace; \
}; \
}} \
namespace new_namespace {} \
namespace old_namespace { \
using namespace new_namespace; \
}
Add the above macro to all headers that previously
declared the deprecated namespace to trigger a
warning. This is extremely inconvenient because
every file that includes that header will trigger
the deprecation warning, so the compilation output
gets VERY clogged.
2) Similar to 1), but do not use the temporary variable
on declaration. This would require using the variable
somewhere else, like a respective .c file. This is
not always possible, so we could resort to adding a
special file (e.g., base/deprecated_elements.cc)
containing all uses of the deprecated temporary
variables.
3)
\#define GEM5_DEPRECATED_NAMESPACE(old_ns, new_ns) \
namespace old_ns = new_ns;
Similar to 3), but simply declare an alias in the
header files (see above macro) to maintain backwards
compatibility. Then use the special file to declare
all deprecation messages.
4)
Rely on release notes / e-mail to the mailing list
to inform that those are deprecated.
We have selected option 4 for these problematic instances.
Checking if namespace deprecation is possible is done
through scons.
Jira issues:
https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-975https://gem5.atlassian.net/browse/GEM5-991
Change-Id: Ide234f6a8707d88a869fa843bf8c61ca7714e4f3
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/45246
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Also add macros which define the old names to the new names for
backwards compatibility.
This change also takes the opportunity to rename the M5_ATTR_PACKED
macro to GEM5_PACKED, dropping the ATTR. None of the other attribute
based macros bother to specify that they stand for an attribute, making
this one inconsistent and overly verbose.
Similarly, it renames M5_NODISCARD to GEM5_NO_DISCARD to be consistent
with other macros which separate out individual words like GEM5_VAR_USED
and GEM5_NO_INLINE
Change-Id: I22d404492faf28b79a8247f869f14af21c9cf967
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/45230
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
GEM5_DEPRECATED(message) expands to the [[gnu::deprecated(message)]]
attribute on gnu compatible compilers and marks an entity (function,
variable, etc) as deprecated. The msg parameter should be used to tell
the user what they should do to move away from the deprecated entity.
GEM5_DEPRECATED_MACRO(name, definition, message) is used inside an
expression-like macro with definition "definition" to mark that macro as
deprecated with message "message". For instance, if there were macros
like this:
#define SUM(a, b) ((a) + (b))
#define ONE 1
We could mark that as deprecated like so:
#define SUM(a, b) GEM5_DEPRECATED_MACRO(SUM, (a) + (b), \
"The SUM macro is deprecated, use the + operator instead.")
#define ONE GEM5_DEPRECATED_MACRO(ONE, 1, "Use the literal 1.")
Note that this macro should not be used for macros which, for instance,
declare variables, since it assumes the body of the macro expands into
an expression and not a statement or statements.
Change-Id: I58f5e834cfeeb23e37a6548433dfe7e4f695a5ec
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/45086
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Rather than just leaving some macros undefined if none of the scenarios
we checked for match, we should report an error so it's clear what
happened. Otherwise the places the macros are used will just not compile
properly, or worse will silently not work correctly.
Change-Id: Ie010d6b6d1b6a1496a45d9ebc0d75d1c804df12f
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35275
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This change replaces the __attribute__ syntax with the now standard [[]]
syntax. It also reorganizes compiler.hh so that all special macros have
some explanatory text saying what they do, and each attribute which has a
standard version can use that if available and what version of c++ it's
standard in is put in a comment.
Also, the requirements as far as where you put [[]] style attributes are
a little more strict than the old school __attribute__ style. The use of
the attribute macros was updated to fit these new, more strict
requirements.
Change-Id: Iace44306a534111f1c38b9856dc9e88cd9b49d2a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35219
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This macro probably would have been defined to "return" in some cases,
to be put after a call to a function that doesn't return so that the
compiler wouldn't think control would reach the end of a non-void
function. It was only ever defined to expand to nothing, and now that
[[noreturn]] is a standard attribute, it should never be needed going
forward.
Change-Id: I37625eab72deeaede77f9347116b9fddd75febf7
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35217
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
There are cases where we need to limit the symbol visibility to avoid
compilation errors. This is a problem for Python code that relies on
PyBind11 since recent versions enforce hidden symbols. As a
consequence, classes that have member variables from PyBind11 need to
be declared with the hidden attribute (or gem5 needs to be compiled
with -fvisibility=hidden).
Change-Id: I30e582fde494ff61ab7a596a595efc26a2952a5f
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/11513
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
This change adds the M5_NODISCARD keyword to allow use of the
[[nodiscard]] attribute with compilers that support C++17. Currently,
C++17 is not a requirement and therefore the M5_NODISCARD has not
effect and does not break compilation for older compilers.
Change-Id: Ifc5c8f34764da3c7291066dcb2ff908c97738c3d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/10441
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Gutierrez <anthony.gutierrez@amd.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Anthony Gutierrez <anthony.gutierrez@amd.com>
gcc 7 onwards have additional heuristics to detect implicit
fallthroughs and it fails the build with warnings for ARM as a result.
There was one gcc bug[1] that I fixed but the rest are cases that gcc
cannot detect due to the point at which it does the fallthrough check.
Most of this patch adds __builtin_unreachable() hints in places that throw
this warning to indicate to gcc that the fallthrough will never
happen.
The remaining cases are actually possible fallthroughs due to
incorrect code running on the simulator; in which case an Unknown
instruction is returned.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg01105.html
Change-Id: I1baa9fa0ed15181c10c755c0bd777f88b607c158
Signed-off-by: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/8541
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Maintainer: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
GCC 7.2 is much stricter than previous GCC versions. The following changes
are needed:
* There is now a warning if there is an implicit fallthrough between two
case statments. C++17 adds the [[fallthrough]]; declaration. However,
to support non C++17 standards (i.e., C++11), we use M5_FALLTHROUGH.
M5_FALLTHROUGH checks for [[fallthrough]] compliant C++17 compiler and
if that doesn't exist, it defaults to nothing (no older compilers
generate warnings).
* The above resulted in a couple of bugs that were found. This is noted
in the review request on gerrit.
* throw() for dynamic exception specification is deprecated
* There were a couple of new uninitialized variable warnings
* Can no longer perform bitwise operations on a bool.
* Must now include <functional> for std::function
* Compiler bug for void* lambda. Changed to auto as work around. See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Change-Id: I5d4c782a4e133fa4cdb119e35d9aff68c6e2958e
Signed-off-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/5802
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
std::make_unique is not available for C++11 compilers, and it has been
introduced only in C++14. Since gem5 is not officially supporting the
latter at the moment, this patch allows to use it in gem5 if including
base/compiler.hh. If compiled under C++14, std::make_unique will be
used instead.
Change-Id: Ibf1897fad0a1eb1cb0c683cc25170feaa6841997
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/5201
Reviewed-by: Anthony Gutierrez <anthony.gutierrez@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
This patch moves away from using M5_ATTR_OVERRIDE and the m5::hashmap
(and similar) abstractions, as these are no longer needed with gcc 4.7
and clang 3.1 as minimum compiler versions.
Gcc and clang both provide an attribute that can be used to flag a
function as deprecated at compile time. This changeset adds a gem5
compiler macro for that compiler feature. The macro can be used to
indicate that a legacy API within gem5 has been deprecated and provide
a graceful migration to the new API.
Add the macros M5_ATTR_FINAL and M5_ATTR_OVERRIDE which are defined to
final and override respectively if supported by the compiler. This is
done to allow a smooth transition to gcc >= 4.7.
The M5_PRAGMA_NORETURN macro was only used in for
__exit_message. Since the macro only holds a stub definition and all
functions with noreturn semantics use the M5_ATTR_NORETURN, this
macros is completely redundant.
This patch checks that the compiler in use is either gcc >= 4.4 or
clang >= 2.9. and enables building with --std=c++0x in all cases. As a
consequence, we can tidy up the hashmap and always have static_assert
available. If anyone wants to use alternative compilers, icc for
example supports c++0x to a similar level and could be added if
needed.
This patch opens up for a more elaborate use of c++0x features that
are present in gcc 4.4 and clang 2.9, e.g. auto typed variables,
variadic templates, rvalues and move semantics, and strongly typed
enums. There will be no going back on this one...
This patch simply prunes the SUNCC and ICC compiler options as they
are both sufficiently stale that they would have to be re-written from
scratch anyhow. The patch serves to clean things up before shifting to
a build environment that enforces basic c++11 compliance as done in
the following patch.
C++11 has support for static_asserts to provide compile-time assertion
checking. This is very useful when testing, for example, structure
sizes to make sure that the compiler got the right alignment or vector
sizes.
SConstruct:
src/SConscript:
Add flags for Intel CC while i'm at it
src/base/compiler.hh:
the _Pragma stuff needst to be called this way unless someone happens to have a cleaner way
src/base/cprintf_formats.hh:
add std:: where appropriate
src/base/statistics.hh:
use this->map since icc was getting confused about std::map vs the locally defined map
src/cpu/static_inst.hh:
Add some more dummy returns where needed
src/mem/packet.hh:
add more dummy returns where needed
src/sim/host.hh:
use limits to come up with max tick
--HG--
extra : convert_revision : 08e9f7898b29fb9d063136529afb9b6abceab60c
