mem-cache: Move cache bypass mechanism to the ports

Cache bypass is necessary for cpu models like the KvmCPU. Previously
the bypass would happen at the cache classes. With this change the
bypassing happens directly at the ports.

Change-Id: I34de9fc63383aee8590643e169501ea6060d2d62
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/10432
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nikos Nikoleris
2018-05-03 15:51:41 +01:00
parent 41db9b95aa
commit 7d990bd25b
2 changed files with 37 additions and 37 deletions

51
src/mem/cache/base.cc vendored
View File

@@ -632,17 +632,6 @@ BaseCache::recvAtomic(PacketPtr pkt)
void
BaseCache::functionalAccess(PacketPtr pkt, bool from_cpu_side)
{
if (system->bypassCaches()) {
// Packets from the memory side are snoop request and
// shouldn't happen in bypass mode.
assert(from_cpu_side);
// The cache should be flushed if we are in cache bypass mode,
// so we don't need to check if we need to update anything.
memSidePort.sendFunctional(pkt);
return;
}
Addr blk_addr = pkt->getBlockAddr(blkSize);
bool is_secure = pkt->isSecure();
CacheBlk *blk = tags->findBlock(pkt->getAddr(), is_secure);
@@ -2147,6 +2136,11 @@ BaseCache::regStats()
bool
BaseCache::CpuSidePort::recvTimingSnoopResp(PacketPtr pkt)
{
// Snoops shouldn't happen when bypassing caches
assert(!cache->system->bypassCaches());
assert(pkt->isResponse());
// Express snoop responses from master to slave, e.g., from L1 to L2
cache->recvTimingSnoopResp(pkt);
return true;
@@ -2156,7 +2150,7 @@ BaseCache::CpuSidePort::recvTimingSnoopResp(PacketPtr pkt)
bool
BaseCache::CpuSidePort::tryTiming(PacketPtr pkt)
{
if (pkt->isExpressSnoop()) {
if (cache->system->bypassCaches() || pkt->isExpressSnoop()) {
// always let express snoop packets through even if blocked
return true;
} else if (blocked || mustSendRetry) {
@@ -2171,7 +2165,15 @@ BaseCache::CpuSidePort::tryTiming(PacketPtr pkt)
bool
BaseCache::CpuSidePort::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
if (tryTiming(pkt)) {
assert(pkt->isRequest());
if (cache->system->bypassCaches()) {
// Just forward the packet if caches are disabled.
// @todo This should really enqueue the packet rather
bool M5_VAR_USED success = cache->memSidePort.sendTimingReq(pkt);
assert(success);
return true;
} else if (tryTiming(pkt)) {
cache->recvTimingReq(pkt);
return true;
}
@@ -2181,12 +2183,24 @@ BaseCache::CpuSidePort::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
Tick
BaseCache::CpuSidePort::recvAtomic(PacketPtr pkt)
{
return cache->recvAtomic(pkt);
if (cache->system->bypassCaches()) {
// Forward the request if the system is in cache bypass mode.
return cache->memSidePort.sendAtomic(pkt);
} else {
return cache->recvAtomic(pkt);
}
}
void
BaseCache::CpuSidePort::recvFunctional(PacketPtr pkt)
{
if (cache->system->bypassCaches()) {
// The cache should be flushed if we are in cache bypass mode,
// so we don't need to check if we need to update anything.
cache->memSidePort.sendFunctional(pkt);
return;
}
// functional request
cache->functionalAccess(pkt, true);
}
@@ -2221,6 +2235,9 @@ BaseCache::MemSidePort::recvTimingResp(PacketPtr pkt)
void
BaseCache::MemSidePort::recvTimingSnoopReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
// Snoops shouldn't happen when bypassing caches
assert(!cache->system->bypassCaches());
// handle snooping requests
cache->recvTimingSnoopReq(pkt);
}
@@ -2228,12 +2245,18 @@ BaseCache::MemSidePort::recvTimingSnoopReq(PacketPtr pkt)
Tick
BaseCache::MemSidePort::recvAtomicSnoop(PacketPtr pkt)
{
// Snoops shouldn't happen when bypassing caches
assert(!cache->system->bypassCaches());
return cache->recvAtomicSnoop(pkt);
}
void
BaseCache::MemSidePort::recvFunctionalSnoop(PacketPtr pkt)
{
// Snoops shouldn't happen when bypassing caches
assert(!cache->system->bypassCaches());
// functional snoop (note that in contrast to atomic we don't have
// a specific functionalSnoop method, as they have the same
// behaviour regardless)

View File

@@ -271,9 +271,6 @@ Cache::recvTimingSnoopResp(PacketPtr pkt)
{
DPRINTF(Cache, "%s for %s\n", __func__, pkt->print());
assert(pkt->isResponse());
assert(!system->bypassCaches());
// determine if the response is from a snoop request we created
// (in which case it should be in the outstandingSnoop), or if we
// merely forwarded someone else's snoop request
@@ -409,16 +406,6 @@ Cache::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
DPRINTF(CacheTags, "%s tags:\n%s\n", __func__, tags->print());
assert(pkt->isRequest());
// Just forward the packet if caches are disabled.
if (system->bypassCaches()) {
// @todo This should really enqueue the packet rather
bool M5_VAR_USED success = memSidePort.sendTimingReq(pkt);
assert(success);
return;
}
promoteWholeLineWrites(pkt);
if (pkt->cacheResponding()) {
@@ -665,10 +652,6 @@ Cache::handleAtomicReqMiss(PacketPtr pkt, CacheBlk *blk,
Tick
Cache::recvAtomic(PacketPtr pkt)
{
// Forward the request if the system is in cache bypass mode.
if (system->bypassCaches())
return ticksToCycles(memSidePort.sendAtomic(pkt));
promoteWholeLineWrites(pkt);
return BaseCache::recvAtomic(pkt);
@@ -1183,9 +1166,6 @@ Cache::recvTimingSnoopReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
DPRINTF(CacheVerbose, "%s: for %s\n", __func__, pkt->print());
// Snoops shouldn't happen when bypassing caches
assert(!system->bypassCaches());
// no need to snoop requests that are not in range
if (!inRange(pkt->getAddr())) {
return;
@@ -1309,9 +1289,6 @@ Cache::recvTimingSnoopReq(PacketPtr pkt)
Tick
Cache::recvAtomicSnoop(PacketPtr pkt)
{
// Snoops shouldn't happen when bypassing caches
assert(!system->bypassCaches());
// no need to snoop requests that are not in range.
if (!inRange(pkt->getAddr())) {
return 0;