This makes what are configuration and what are internal SCons variables
explicit and separate, and makes it unnecessary to call out what
variables to export to C++.
These variables will also be plumbed into and out of kconfiglib in later
changes.
Change-Id: Iaf5e098d7404af06285c421dbdf8ef4171b3f001
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/56892
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These false positives break the build. The error is below, and is bogus
as best I can tell. The constructor for the sc_unsigned and sc_signed
types, defined with some macro goop in sc_nbcommon.inc, have a call to
vec_copy_and_zero to copy over some data and zero the data that isn't
copied. That only happens if the source is smaller than the destination.
Then in vec_copy_and_zero, it calls vec_zero to set the last elements to
zero. Because of the check back at the constructor, only values that
exist should ever be set.
Also, in gem5, SC_MAX_NBITS is not set, so the definition of the array
it's bounds checking is declared right near where it's used and is sized
based on the variable being passed into vec_copy_and_zero.
In file included from build/ARM/systemc/ext/dt/bit/../int/../fx/sc_fxdefs.hh:52,
from build/ARM/systemc/ext/dt/bit/../int/sc_length_param.hh:63,
from build/ARM/systemc/ext/dt/bit/sc_bv_base.hh:56,
from build/ARM/systemc/dt/int/sc_unsigned.cc:83:
In function 'void sc_dt::vec_zero(int, int, sc_dt::sc_digit*)',
inlined from 'void sc_dt::vec_copy_and_zero(int, sc_dt::sc_digit*, int, const sc_digit*)' at build/ARM/systemc/ext/dt/bit/../int/../fx/../int/sc_nbutils.hh:407:13,
inlined from 'sc_dt::sc_unsigned::sc_unsigned(sc_dt::small_type, int, int, sc_dt::sc_digit*, bool)' at build/ARM/systemc/dt/int/sc_nbcommon.inc:2285:26:
build/ARM/systemc/ext/dt/bit/../int/../fx/../int/sc_nbutils.hh:379:14: error: 'void* __builtin_memset(void*, int, long unsigned int)' offset [12, 15] is out of the bounds [0, 12] [-Werror=array-bounds]
379 | u[i] = 0;
|
Change-Id: Ica721178b24de56dbeabf4af7d3422dea6336a23
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/29432
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This class is supposed to be a more efficient way to manage small bits
of memory. At least for now, new and delete will do the same job
functionally. Also, the heap manager may be just as efficient as
whatever custom mechanism sc_mempool would use.
Change-Id: I6fdc01a69ca017d94b14a15a196ad29b66ef9858
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13292
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
The datatype code was checking if SC_LONG_64 was defined to determine
if a long was 64 bits. The code that would define that value was
dropped when porting over from the Accellera implementation, and so
the wrong code was being included. This change both makes those checks
look at the *value* of SC_LONG_64 to ensure that it's not missing by
accident, and assigns it a value in sc_fxdefs.hh.
Change-Id: Ie9bb1146452a3db1d9d99c0db575098bb06463ff
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12616
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Those messages include an error number in the Accellera implementation.
Add those numbers to gem5 so it's easier to check against golden
reference output for the regression tests.
Change-Id: I35054dd187e86a87eb177f4695d61044c58ce262
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12450
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Because sc_inout needs sc_dt::sc_logic and that probably calls
functions from dt_sc_mempool.cc and because those hadn't yet been
stubbed out. This change adds stubs for those as well.
Change-Id: I544a1669575b594d4612558b8b6f47668ac94414
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12221
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Most (but not all) of the SystemC headers are part of the "external"
interface that an existing, standard compliant module would include
through <systemc.h> or <systemc>. Since those follow slightly different
rules (relative includes, no gem5 includes), this change separates them
out so that they're easier to identify.
Also, this change moves the other files into a "core" subdirectory,
with the intention to add a "dt", aka data type, directory some time in
the future when those standard defined types are implemented.
Change-Id: Ida63f9cc0bc0431024d4dd691cc5b22b944a99a8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/10835
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>