mem: Use Packet writing functions instead of memcpy
Classes were using memcpy instead of the Packet functions created for writing to/from the packet. This allows these writes to be better checked and tracked. This also fixes a bug in MemCheckerMonitor, which was using the incorrect type for the packet pointer. Change-Id: I5bbc8a24e59464e8219bb6d54af8209e6d4ee1af Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br> Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13695 Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com> Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Daniel Carvalho
parent
49798e0efa
commit
adde4c91f9
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ AbstractMemory::access(PacketPtr pkt)
|
||||
if (pkt->cmd == MemCmd::SwapReq) {
|
||||
if (pkt->isAtomicOp()) {
|
||||
if (pmemAddr) {
|
||||
memcpy(pkt->getPtr<uint8_t>(), hostAddr, pkt->getSize());
|
||||
pkt->setData(hostAddr);
|
||||
(*(pkt->getAtomicOp()))(hostAddr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
@@ -345,15 +345,14 @@ AbstractMemory::access(PacketPtr pkt)
|
||||
uint64_t condition_val64;
|
||||
uint32_t condition_val32;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!pmemAddr)
|
||||
panic("Swap only works if there is real memory (i.e. null=False)");
|
||||
panic_if(!pmemAddr, "Swap only works if there is real memory " \
|
||||
"(i.e. null=False)");
|
||||
|
||||
bool overwrite_mem = true;
|
||||
// keep a copy of our possible write value, and copy what is at the
|
||||
// memory address into the packet
|
||||
std::memcpy(&overwrite_val[0], pkt->getConstPtr<uint8_t>(),
|
||||
pkt->getSize());
|
||||
std::memcpy(pkt->getPtr<uint8_t>(), hostAddr, pkt->getSize());
|
||||
pkt->writeData(&overwrite_val[0]);
|
||||
pkt->setData(hostAddr);
|
||||
|
||||
if (pkt->req->isCondSwap()) {
|
||||
if (pkt->getSize() == sizeof(uint64_t)) {
|
||||
@@ -383,8 +382,9 @@ AbstractMemory::access(PacketPtr pkt)
|
||||
// to do the LL/SC tracking here
|
||||
trackLoadLocked(pkt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (pmemAddr)
|
||||
memcpy(pkt->getPtr<uint8_t>(), hostAddr, pkt->getSize());
|
||||
if (pmemAddr) {
|
||||
pkt->setData(hostAddr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE_PACKET(pkt->req->isInstFetch() ? "IFetch" : "Read");
|
||||
numReads[pkt->req->masterId()]++;
|
||||
bytesRead[pkt->req->masterId()] += pkt->getSize();
|
||||
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ AbstractMemory::access(PacketPtr pkt)
|
||||
} else if (pkt->isWrite()) {
|
||||
if (writeOK(pkt)) {
|
||||
if (pmemAddr) {
|
||||
memcpy(hostAddr, pkt->getConstPtr<uint8_t>(), pkt->getSize());
|
||||
pkt->writeData(hostAddr);
|
||||
DPRINTF(MemoryAccess, "%s wrote %i bytes to address %x\n",
|
||||
__func__, pkt->getSize(), pkt->getAddr());
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -426,13 +426,15 @@ AbstractMemory::functionalAccess(PacketPtr pkt)
|
||||
uint8_t *hostAddr = pmemAddr + pkt->getAddr() - range.start();
|
||||
|
||||
if (pkt->isRead()) {
|
||||
if (pmemAddr)
|
||||
memcpy(pkt->getPtr<uint8_t>(), hostAddr, pkt->getSize());
|
||||
if (pmemAddr) {
|
||||
pkt->setData(hostAddr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE_PACKET("Read");
|
||||
pkt->makeResponse();
|
||||
} else if (pkt->isWrite()) {
|
||||
if (pmemAddr)
|
||||
memcpy(hostAddr, pkt->getConstPtr<uint8_t>(), pkt->getSize());
|
||||
if (pmemAddr) {
|
||||
pkt->writeData(hostAddr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE_PACKET("Write");
|
||||
pkt->makeResponse();
|
||||
} else if (pkt->isPrint()) {
|
||||
|
||||
3
src/mem/cache/base.cc
vendored
3
src/mem/cache/base.cc
vendored
@@ -861,10 +861,9 @@ BaseCache::satisfyRequest(PacketPtr pkt, CacheBlk *blk, bool, bool)
|
||||
if (pkt->isAtomicOp()) {
|
||||
// extract data from cache and save it into the data field in
|
||||
// the packet as a return value from this atomic op
|
||||
|
||||
int offset = tags->extractBlkOffset(pkt->getAddr());
|
||||
uint8_t *blk_data = blk->data + offset;
|
||||
std::memcpy(pkt->getPtr<uint8_t>(), blk_data, pkt->getSize());
|
||||
pkt->setData(blk_data);
|
||||
|
||||
// execute AMO operation
|
||||
(*(pkt->getAtomicOp()))(blk_data);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ MemCheckerMonitor::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
|
||||
// write. For reads, we have no data yet, so it doesn't make sense to
|
||||
// allocate.
|
||||
pkt_data.reset(new uint8_t[size]);
|
||||
memcpy(pkt_data.get(), pkt->getConstPtr<uint8_t*>(), size);
|
||||
pkt->writeData(pkt_data.get());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If a cache miss is served by a cache, a monitor near the memory
|
||||
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ MemCheckerMonitor::recvTimingResp(PacketPtr pkt)
|
||||
// a read. For writes, we have already given the MemChecker the data on
|
||||
// the request, so it doesn't make sense to allocate on write.
|
||||
pkt_data.reset(new uint8_t[size]);
|
||||
memcpy(pkt_data.get(), pkt->getConstPtr<uint8_t*>(), size);
|
||||
pkt->writeData(pkt_data.get());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_read || is_write) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user