This is different from the message the Accellera implementation would print, so it looks like it wouldn't pass this test as is. Change-Id: I0286fd3e3df7bc3e87f38c35086a32d8dec0bcc9 Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12814 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>