Apply the gem5 namespace to the codebase.
Some anonymous namespaces could theoretically be removed,
but since this change's main goal was to keep conflicts
at a minimum, it was decided not to modify much the
general shape of the files.
A few missing comments of the form "// namespace X" that
occurred before the newly added "} // namespace gem5"
have been added for consistency.
std out should not be included in the gem5 namespace, so
they weren't.
ProtoMessage has not been included in the gem5 namespace,
since I'm not familiar with how proto works.
Regarding the SystemC files, although they belong to gem5,
they actually perform integration between gem5 and SystemC;
therefore, it deserved its own separate namespace.
Files that are automatically generated have been included
in the gem5 namespace.
The .isa files currently are limited to a single namespace.
This limitation should be later removed to make it easier
to accomodate a better API.
Regarding the files in util, gem5:: was prepended where
suitable. Notice that this patch was tested as much as
possible given that most of these were already not
previously compiling.
Change-Id: Ia53d404ec79c46edaa98f654e23bc3b0e179fe2d
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/46323
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Poremba <matthew.poremba@amd.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The create() method on Params structs usually instantiate SimObjects
using a constructor which takes the Params struct as a parameter
somehow. There has been a lot of needless variation in how that was
done, making it annoying to pass Params down to base classes. Some of
the different forms were:
const Params &
Params &
Params *
const Params *
Params const*
This change goes through and fixes up every constructor and every
create() method to use the const Params & form. We use a reference
because the Params struct should never be null. We use const because
neither the create method nor the consuming object should modify the
record of the parameters as they came in from the config. That would
make consuming them not idempotent, and make it impossible to tell what
the actual simulation configuration was since it would change from any
user visible form (config script, config.ini, dot pdf output).
Change-Id: I77453cba52fdcfd5f4eec92dfb0bddb5a9945f31
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35938
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This reverts commit bf0a722acd.
Reason for revert: This patch introduces a bug:
The problem here is that the insertion of block A may cause the
eviction of block B, which on the lower level may cause the
eviction of block A. Since A is not marked as present yet, A is
"safely" removed from the snoop filter
However, by reverting it, using atomic and a Tags sub-class that
can generate multiple evictions at once becomes broken when using
Atomic mode and shall be fixed in a future patch.
Change-Id: I5b27e54b54ae5b50255588835c1a2ebf3015f002
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/19088
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Previously all atomic writebacks concerned a single block,
therefore, when a block was evicted, no other block would be
pending eviction. With sector tags (and compression),
however, a single replacement can generate many evictions.
This can cause problems, since a writeback that evicts a block
may evict blocks in the lower cache. If one of these conflict
with one of the blocks pending eviction in the higher level, the
snoop must inform it to the lower level. Since atomic mode does
not have a writebuffer, this kind of conflict wouldn't be noticed.
Therefore, instead of evicting multiple blocks at once, we
do it one by one.
Change-Id: I2fc2f9eb0f26248ddf91adbe987d158f5a2e592b
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/18209
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
This patch changes how we deal with whole-line writes their
responses. With these changes, we use the MSHR tracking to determine
if a whole-line is written, and on a fill we simply handle the
invalidation response, with the actual writes taking place as part of
satisfying the CPU-side hit.
Change-Id: I9a18e41a95db3c20b97f8bca7d95ff33d35a578b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12905
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
"4976ff5 mem-cache: Refactor the recvAtomic function" introduced a bug
where if an atomic request that fills in using the tempBlock it will
not evict it when it finishes handling the request as it should. This
triggers an assertion. This change fixes this bug.
Change-Id: I73c808a7e15237eddb36b5448ef6728f7bcf7fd9
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12644
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
The class re-uses the existing MSHR and write queue. At the moment
every single access is handled by the cache, even uncacheable
accesses, and nothing is forwarded.
This is a modified version of a changeset put together by Andreas
Hansson <andreas.hansson@arm.com>
Change-Id: I41f7f9c2b8c7fa5ec23712a4446e8adb1c9a336a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/8291
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
