Apply the gem5 namespace to the codebase.
Some anonymous namespaces could theoretically be removed,
but since this change's main goal was to keep conflicts
at a minimum, it was decided not to modify much the
general shape of the files.
A few missing comments of the form "// namespace X" that
occurred before the newly added "} // namespace gem5"
have been added for consistency.
std out should not be included in the gem5 namespace, so
they weren't.
ProtoMessage has not been included in the gem5 namespace,
since I'm not familiar with how proto works.
Regarding the SystemC files, although they belong to gem5,
they actually perform integration between gem5 and SystemC;
therefore, it deserved its own separate namespace.
Files that are automatically generated have been included
in the gem5 namespace.
The .isa files currently are limited to a single namespace.
This limitation should be later removed to make it easier
to accomodate a better API.
Regarding the files in util, gem5:: was prepended where
suitable. Notice that this patch was tested as much as
possible given that most of these were already not
previously compiling.
Change-Id: Ia53d404ec79c46edaa98f654e23bc3b0e179fe2d
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/46323
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Poremba <matthew.poremba@amd.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The second argument in the std::max call is treated as an unsigned value
as all variables are unsigned as well. This will result in an
unsigned underflow, and as such the std::max is a no-op and will result
in the underflowed value.
The `start` and `used` value get corrupted after that, and checks for
`empty` and other stuff downstream break.
Change-Id: I00017e22ba84e65f6b1c596f47d348f342fbc304
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/39496
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Comparing arrays with memcmp is fairly easy to do and will correctly
identify when a value is incorrect, but gtest doesn't know what
comparison actually happened and can't print any diagnostic information
to help the person running the test determine what went wrong.
Unfortunately, gtest is also slightly too smart and also not smart
enough to make it easy to compare the contents of sub-arrays with each
other. The thing you're checking the value of *must* be an array with a
well defined size (not a pointer), and the size *must* exactly match the
number of elements it expects to find.
One fairly clean way to get around this problem would be to use the new
std::span type introduced in c++20 which lets you refer to a sub-section
of another container in place, adjusting indexing, sizing, etc as
needed. Unfortunately since we only require up to c++-14 currently we
can't use that type.
Instead, we can create vectors which hold copies of the required data.
This is suboptimal since it means we're copying around data which
doesn't really need to be copied, but it means that the templates in
gtest will get a type they can handle, and the sizes will match like it
expects them to. Since the number of checks/copies is still small, the
overhead should be trivial in practice.
A helper function, subArr, has been added to help keep things fairly
clutter free.
Change-Id: I9f88c583a6a742346b177dba7cae791824b65942
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/38895
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
This makes the name easier to read, looks ok if the file is named with
underscores between words or not, is easy to grep for, and shouldn't
introduce any ambiguities in the file names.
Change-Id: I34b7bcccea2d87c10c0de417dd5e3ef27c4b5666
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/14676
Reviewed-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
