These warnings were removed when the functionality they warned about
was implemented, but there were some leftovers like unnecessary
includes and some helper functions which hid gem5 specific headers
from the ext directory.
Change-Id: Ic886ac0f1264687524e3a7b7eaab8836f318a5a2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13398
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
To avoid making it hard to change sc_object's implementation in the
future, this change keeps most of the data members out of sc_object and
keeps them in a seperate Object which is managed independently but
still matches to the sc_objects one to one.
This change also moves away from the SystemC/sc_gem5 namespace pair in
favor of sc_gem5. Having two namespaces with classes, etc, living in
both was complicating things. Having to use a namespace that doesn't
fit in one scheme or the other isn't great, but it's the lesser of two
evils.
Change-Id: Ib59c3c515ca98c7fe519c59e9fe9270304b71cc0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/11611
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Most (but not all) of the SystemC headers are part of the "external"
interface that an existing, standard compliant module would include
through <systemc.h> or <systemc>. Since those follow slightly different
rules (relative includes, no gem5 includes), this change separates them
out so that they're easier to identify.
Also, this change moves the other files into a "core" subdirectory,
with the intention to add a "dt", aka data type, directory some time in
the future when those standard defined types are implemented.
Change-Id: Ida63f9cc0bc0431024d4dd691cc5b22b944a99a8
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/10835
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
