This is in contrast to how Accellera actually implements it, implying
they would fail their own test.
The specific difference is that suppress_id should only suppress
SC_INFO and SC_WARNING, not all severity levels like the Accellera
implementation will do.
Change-Id: I34f0d2d5912548963433a785cfa6ef88ad818042
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13320
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
This is actually not consistent with how it was handled in 2.0.1 which
is supposedly what this is supposed to be backwards compatible with,
in that in the earlier version on info and warning messages were
suppressed. This is exposed by one of the tests,
utils/sc_report/test01, which suppresses an integer ID and then reports
an error with it. The "golden" output shows the message supressed, but
the actual implementation makes no such distinction.
This implementation duplicates Accelleras for now, but a future change
will make it consistent with the old implementation so the test will
pass.
Change-Id: I8f959321151e2bb60b94000594f30531b80e2684
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13319
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
There's a deprecated reporting mechanism based on integer message ids,
and the reporting mechanism needs to be refactored a bit to make it
easier to support.
Some bookkeeping data structures were moved out to somewhere they
can be accessed by other code, obviating the non-standard get_handler
function.
Change-Id: Id427cd79be9ef0f3275fbac39ff047ab672fb3e0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13318
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
This change tightens up exception catching and makes gem5's systemc
code react to exceptions more in line with the Accellera
implementation. This prevents exceptions from being caught by the
pybind11 integration which makes it very difficult to see where an
exception came from, and makes the output differ by including a
(mostly useless) backtrace.
Change-Id: I7130d53a98fadd137073d1718f780f32f57c658c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12601
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
The original strings pointed to by those parameters may go away before
the sc_report has been completely consumed. By copying them, we make
sure other consumers downstream can still access them.
Change-Id: Iab9a802b7ae3bb5aed3a2716cd92886b8d241dfa
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/12469
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
It was checking the first character of the message for a null byte, but
not whether the message string pointer itself was null.
Change-Id: Iddef1e22c35b55c8c898670576ab416dd1023d7c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/12252
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
These overloads of sc_trace take the unsigned version of some primitive
types. The compiler thought it was ambiguous how to convert an unsigned
integer value into a signed one since there were several different
functions which took signed integer parameters of various sizes.
These versions of sc_trace aren't in the standard, but they are in the
Accellera implementation and do fix building of the regression tests.
Change-Id: I26fd06d90ae6bf5fc5aed24bc2ac826ad69eee31
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/11182
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
