Implementation of a Tree-PLRU replacement policy. It is based on
the assumption that a set associative cache is used.
Change-Id: I74b227e88fd6c93aab5bb2cd0e8730376db28f52
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/11106
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Implementation of a Second-Chance replacement policy. Similar to FIFO,
but every block is given a second chance if it has been touched.
Change-Id: Id4d52b698d0045a4914a4d848fdf9c3c00a28508
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/9441
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Replacement data is specific for each replacement policy, and thus
should be instantiated differently by each policy.
Touch() and reset() do not need to be aware of CacheBlk, as they
only update its ReplacementData.
Invalidate() makes replacement policies independent of cache blocks,
by removing the awareness of the valid state.
An inheritable base ReplaceableEntry class was created to allow usage
of replacement policies with any table-like structure.
Change-Id: I998917d800fa48504ed95abffa2f1b7bfd68522b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/9421
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Replacement policies (LRU, Random) are currently considered as array
indexing methods, but have completely different functionalities:
- Array indexers determine the possible locations for block allocation.
This information is used to generate replacement candidates when
conflicts happen.
- Replacement policies determine which of the replacement candidates
should be evicted to make room for new allocations.
For this reason, they were split into different classes. Advantages:
- Easier and more straightforward to implement other replacement
policies (RRIP, LFU, ARC, ...)
- Allow easier future implementation of cache organization schemes
As now we can't assure the use of sets, the previous way to create a
true LRU is not viable. Now a timestamp_bits parameter controls how
many bits are dedicated for the timestamp, and a true LRU can be
achieved through an infinite number of bits (although a few bits suffice
in practice).
Change-Id: I23750db121f1474d17831137e6ff618beb2b3eda
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/8501
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
