Apply the gem5 namespace to the codebase.
Some anonymous namespaces could theoretically be removed,
but since this change's main goal was to keep conflicts
at a minimum, it was decided not to modify much the
general shape of the files.
A few missing comments of the form "// namespace X" that
occurred before the newly added "} // namespace gem5"
have been added for consistency.
std out should not be included in the gem5 namespace, so
they weren't.
ProtoMessage has not been included in the gem5 namespace,
since I'm not familiar with how proto works.
Regarding the SystemC files, although they belong to gem5,
they actually perform integration between gem5 and SystemC;
therefore, it deserved its own separate namespace.
Files that are automatically generated have been included
in the gem5 namespace.
The .isa files currently are limited to a single namespace.
This limitation should be later removed to make it easier
to accomodate a better API.
Regarding the files in util, gem5:: was prepended where
suitable. Notice that this patch was tested as much as
possible given that most of these were already not
previously compiling.
Change-Id: Ia53d404ec79c46edaa98f654e23bc3b0e179fe2d
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/46323
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Poremba <matthew.poremba@amd.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The idea of this template was to distinguish types which should
grow/shrink based on the native size of the ABI in question. Or in other
words, if the ABI was 32 bit, the type should also be 32 bit, or 64 bit
and 64 bit.
Unfortunately, I had intended for Addr to be a conforming type (since
local pointers would be conforming), but uint64_t not to be. Since Addr
is defined as a typedef of uint64_t, the compiler would make *both*
types conforming, giving incorrect behavior on 32 bit systems.
Local pointers will need to be handled in a different way, likely with
the VPtr template, so that they will be treated correctly and not like
an explicitly 64 bit data type.
Change-Id: Idfdd5351260b48bb531a1926b93e0478a297826d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/40495
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This type is primarily used to determine the size of a pointer when
using that ABI, similar to the uintptr_t type, but also less directly
to determine the "native" size of the ABI. For instance, for 32 bit ARM
ABIs, it should be defined as uint32_t since that's both the size of a
uintptr_t, and, less directly, the size of a 32 bit ARM register and
"naturally" sized types in that ABI.
This type can be used by the VPtr template to retrieve its actual value
from a simcall's parameters. In general, when accepting or returning a
pointer or address in a simcall, the VPtr template should be used so
that it's managed correctly by GuestABI. Addr will be treated as a
uint64_t allways which will be incorrect for 32 bit ABIs.
Change-Id: I3af046917387541d6faff96a21a1f1dbf7317e06
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/40496
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
It's very common for system call arguments to be passed in a sequence
of registers, one argument per register. To avoid having that
implementation repeated over and over across the various ISAs and OSes,
these partial ABI implementations provide that mechanism they can just
pull in. They would need to define the sequence of registers to use,
and these would take care of the rest.
Unlike the temporary DefaultSyscallABI which defers to the Process
classes, these read registers from the ThreadContext directly.
Change-Id: Ic72eb8d784ecf4711b5eec76d958a87c70850fce
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/23441
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
