SimplePoolManager doesn't allow mapping of two WGs
simultaneously on the same Compute Unit (provided
the previous WG has been mapped to all the SIMDs)
even if there is sufficient VRF and SRF space
available.
DynPoolManager takes care of that by dynamically
allocating and deallocating register file space
to wavefronts
Change-Id: I2255c68d4b421615d7b231edc05d3ebb27cbd66c
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/32034
Maintainer: Matt Sinclair <mattdsinclair@gmail.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Duțu <alexandru.dutu@amd.com>
The create() method on Params structs usually instantiate SimObjects
using a constructor which takes the Params struct as a parameter
somehow. There has been a lot of needless variation in how that was
done, making it annoying to pass Params down to base classes. Some of
the different forms were:
const Params &
Params &
Params *
const Params *
Params const*
This change goes through and fixes up every constructor and every
create() method to use the const Params & form. We use a reference
because the Params struct should never be null. We use const because
neither the create method nor the consuming object should modify the
record of the parameters as they came in from the config. That would
make consuming them not idempotent, and make it impossible to tell what
the actual simulation configuration was since it would change from any
user visible form (config script, config.ini, dot pdf output).
Change-Id: I77453cba52fdcfd5f4eec92dfb0bddb5a9945f31
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/35938
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
