The functions isSet(), noneSet(), and allSet() assume that
all bits of the underlying container have a corresponding
flag. This is typically not true, and the likelihood of
incorrectly using these functions is high.
Fortunately these functions are not being used anywhere,
and can be safely removed.
Alternatively, a mask could be provided on construction to
determine which bits of the underlying container correspond
to a flag bit, so that the proper bits are checked in these
functions.
Change-Id: Ia7cbfd0726943506a3f04dc417e67a0b57cdbf95
Signed-off-by: Daniel R. Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/38736
Maintainer: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <power.jg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bobby R. Bruce <bbruce@ucdavis.edu>
I did some of the flags and assertions wrong. Thanks to Brad Beckmann
for pointing this out. I should have run the opt regressions instead
of the fast. I also screwed up some of the logical functions in the Flags
class.
In many cases it might be preferable to use bitset, but this object
allows the user more easily manipulate groups of flags because the
underlying type (e.g. uint64_t) is exposed.
