Some build failures has been seen after USE_SYSTEMC being True by
default and that has been caused by double definition of _XOPEN_SOURCE
and _POSIX_C_SOURCE in some python versions (like 2.7.5, 2.7.13) and
/usr/include/features.h (used by gcc)
Python definition should preceed features.h one, since the latter will
manually #undef them before #define them.
Change-Id: I774711aaf8145df9ad7677a393a60cf3662d6816
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/14095
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Now that that's managed in c++, we can do that directly without having
to depend on the python code being available, the code which lets us
call from c++ to python, or for the embedded python interpretter to
have started running and have loaded the appropriate modules.
Change-Id: Ied110d8f22181095f8c0c645636a9bd67964263e
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/14056
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
By pulling out the sc_main fiber (scMainFiber), we can make it
available to different entities in the simulator and avoid having to
have parallel bookkeeping.
Also this will make it possible to hook into sc_main without putting
the code in sc_main.cc.
Change-Id: I7689441424238e9b2e4d2b48e945dea35fd8cc5d
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13977
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
We can now be sure register_id will work even mid static initializers,
so we don't have to use python initialization as a hook to install
these predefined message ids.
Change-Id: I2e4d0c678ddda0a9ce5b114bdf1710f36e955f23
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13976
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
By declaring the map as a static variable in that function and then
returning it, we can guarantee that it's initialized relative to other
static initializers so that we don't try to use a data structure that
isn't constructed yet. This will let us get rid of the dependence on
python for setting up that mapping.
Change-Id: I031ce2039de8f5f79fbb9d76cf1363f15207b64b
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13975
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Lowe-Power <jason@lowepower.com>
The sc_in bind function was hiding the one from sc_port by changing
the const-ness of its parameter. This change explicitly exposes the
underlying sc_port version, and keeps it alongside the new sc_in
version.
This seems mildly dangerous and undesirable because now there are two
very similar functions which would both need to be overridden in order
to get new behavior, but I don't think it's any more dangerous and
undesirable than as (perhaps unintentionally) specified in the
standard.
Change-Id: Ib42a1f8e70bc97abeeeb8d614e71c4019b3a2323
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13880
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
The previous implementation dereferenced a null pointer to create a
reference which would then have its address taken in the sc_bind_proxy
constructor. clang says that that uses undefined behavior, so this
change adds a default constructor which initializes the two contained
pointers to null explicitly.
We have to hope systemc code doesn't play around with sc_bind_proxy too
much and doesn't accidentally use this constructor unintentionally, but
it seems like the least bad possible solution which makes clang happy.
Change-Id: Ic59603495fe7a406586a18ce44de979f84089bcd
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13879
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
These warnings were removed when the functionality they warned about
was implemented, but there were some leftovers like unnecessary
includes and some helper functions which hid gem5 specific headers
from the ext directory.
Change-Id: Ic886ac0f1264687524e3a7b7eaab8836f318a5a2
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13398
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
The scheduler is an internal detail and shouldn't be exposed to the
headers in ext. It would transitively include more headers which are
not in ext, making it not self contained.
Change-Id: I8384cde9d19363953ffd0c91e7d8d27f8f79a570
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13336
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
This is to avoid having to expose the scheduler (which tracks the
current process) to header files which should be independent of gem5
and the underlying implementation.
Change-Id: I1b0810ab66c3ce52b5b94236d7df86da66a62472
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13335
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
STL containers may need to be constructed before they're used. Don't
count on being able to insert into them during a static initializer.
Change-Id: Icb05d5084a470e1ebd976ae6e1954b1a78aabd6a
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13329
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
This is in contrast to how Accellera actually implements it, implying
they would fail their own test.
The specific difference is that suppress_id should only suppress
SC_INFO and SC_WARNING, not all severity levels like the Accellera
implementation will do.
Change-Id: I34f0d2d5912548963433a785cfa6ef88ad818042
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13320
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
This is actually not consistent with how it was handled in 2.0.1 which
is supposedly what this is supposed to be backwards compatible with,
in that in the earlier version on info and warning messages were
suppressed. This is exposed by one of the tests,
utils/sc_report/test01, which suppresses an integer ID and then reports
an error with it. The "golden" output shows the message supressed, but
the actual implementation makes no such distinction.
This implementation duplicates Accelleras for now, but a future change
will make it consistent with the old implementation so the test will
pass.
Change-Id: I8f959321151e2bb60b94000594f30531b80e2684
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13319
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
There's a deprecated reporting mechanism based on integer message ids,
and the reporting mechanism needs to be refactored a bit to make it
easier to support.
Some bookkeeping data structures were moved out to somewhere they
can be accessed by other code, obviating the non-standard get_handler
function.
Change-Id: Id427cd79be9ef0f3275fbac39ff047ab672fb3e0
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13318
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
These arguments were originally just to make sure arguments could be
successfully passed to sc_main, but serve no intrinsic purpose. There
are some tests which can accept command line arguments to customize
how they run, and having nonsense arguments confuses them and makes
them behave incorrectly.
Change-Id: Ib328edb12e01a97dca778bbf45b10e91dd8c07a6
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13317
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
When resetting a process which is ready pending coming out of suspend,
clear that state since the process is about to run in service of the
reset.
Change-Id: Iade3ec4b2f3eadd372cce456dca66850d37ed5fd
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13316
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
The golden reference output for the test was to throw an error which
is clearly not at all related to the test (it was about immediate
self notifications while the test never calls any form of notify())
and which would happen significantly before the end of the test,
negating all the other behaviors and checks which would happen after
that point.
Since it strongly looks like the reference output was updated in error,
and because other very similarly structured tests are expected to run
silently except for printing "Success" at the end (which it does when
run under gem5), this change manually updates the golden reference
output to reflect what appears to be correct.
Change-Id: I9cde81c28774049653d60f1ffd37a2fae875b522
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13315
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
For some reason lost to the sands of time, the throw_it function was
virtual for the Thread class, and that class would call the base
class's throw_it, and then also injectException itself. That would
result in the exception being injected into the thread twice which is
incorrect.
Since it's not clear what the original intention of this code was, the
throw_it function is now no longer virtual, and the one useful aspect
of it, a check if the process is already terminated, was moved into the
base class function.
Change-Id: I7fb14baa7728bd1e9206011870b6ccaa9c4e8c64
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13312
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
If an exception escapes sc_main, Accellera catches it and feeds it
into the report handler, telling it to run the catch actions. This
seems like it sets up lots of dangerous scenarios, and also makes a
vital error detecting path more complex and error prone.
On the other hand, it makes one of the tests pass.
Change-Id: I7f9d07e01e63c7abeee903febe2e434041ec49a4
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/13307
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Maintainer: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
