misc: Use AddrRangeList more consistently in the AddrRange class.

We go through the trouble of defining an AddrRangeList typedef, but then
we don't use it consistently and use std::vector<AddrRange> instead.

This change converts the exclude method from using
std::vector<AddrRange> to AddrRangeList, and also adds a constructor
which takes an AddrRangeList.

Because there is a lot of code which uses the std::vector based
constructor, this change does not remove that method.

Change-Id: I1a03b25990025688aa760a67d3e7a2e8141384ce
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/50344
Reviewed-by: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Maintainer: Daniel Carvalho <odanrc@yahoo.com.br>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>

src/python/m5/SimObject.py

@@ -728,7 +728,6 @@ class MetaSimObject(type):
 
 #include "base/compiler.hh"
 #include "params/$cls.hh"
-#include "python/pybind11/core.hh"
 #include "sim/init.hh"
 #include "sim/sim_object.hh"
 

src/python/m5/params.py

@@ -865,15 +865,10 @@ class AddrRange(ParamValue):
                          self.masks, int(self.intlvMatch))
 
     def exclude(self, ranges):
-        from _m5.range import AddrRangeVector
-
-        # The wrapped C++ class is assuming an AddrRangeVector
-        # We are therefore converting to it before excluding ranges
-        # and reconverting it into a list of AddrRange before returning
-        pybind_exclude = AddrRangeVector([ r.getValue() for r in ranges ])
+        pybind_exclude = list([ r.getValue() for r in ranges ])
         pybind_include = self.getValue().exclude(pybind_exclude)
 
-        return [ AddrRange(r.start(), r.end()) for r in pybind_include ]
+        return list([ AddrRange(r.start(), r.end()) for r in pybind_include ])
 
 # Boolean parameter type.  Python doesn't let you subclass bool, since
 # it doesn't want to let you create multiple instances of True and