derek/gem5
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

MEM: Separate requests and responses for timing accesses

Browse Source 
This patch moves send/recvTiming and send/recvTimingSnoop from the
Port base class to the MasterPort and SlavePort, and also splits them
into separate member functions for requests and responses:
send/recvTimingReq, send/recvTimingResp, and send/recvTimingSnoopReq,
send/recvTimingSnoopResp. A master port sends requests and receives
responses, and also receives snoop requests and sends snoop
responses. A slave port has the reciprocal behaviour as it receives
requests and sends responses, and sends snoop requests and receives
snoop responses.

For all MemObjects that have only master ports or slave ports (but not
both), e.g. a CPU, or a PIO device, this patch merely adds more
clarity to what kind of access is taking place. For example, a CPU
port used to call sendTiming, and will now call
sendTimingReq. Similarly, a response previously came back through
recvTiming, which is now recvTimingResp. For the modules that have
both master and slave ports, e.g. the bus, the behaviour was
previously relying on branches based on pkt->isRequest(), and this is
now replaced with a direct call to the apprioriate member function
depending on the type of access. Please note that send/recvRetry is
still shared by all the timing accessors and remains in the Port base
class for now (to maintain the current bus functionality and avoid
changing the statistics of all regressions).

The packet queue is split into a MasterPort and SlavePort version to
facilitate the use of the new timing accessors. All uses of the
PacketQueue are updated accordingly.

With this patch, the type of packet (request or response) is now well
defined for each type of access, and asserts on pkt->isRequest() and
pkt->isResponse() are now moved to the appropriate send member
functions. It is also worth noting that sendTimingSnoopReq no longer
returns a boolean, as the semantics do not alow snoop requests to be
rejected or stalled. All these assumptions are now excplicitly part of
the port interface itself.
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Hansson
2012-05-01 13:40:42 -04:00
parent 8966e6d36d
commit 3fea59e162
47 changed files with 546 additions and 424 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh vendored
View File

@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ Cache<TagStore>::timingAccess(PacketPtr pkt)
Packet *snoopPkt = new Packet(pkt, true); // clear flags
snoopPkt->setExpressSnoop();
snoopPkt->assertMemInhibit();
memSidePort->sendTiming(snoopPkt);
memSidePort->sendTimingReq(snoopPkt);
// main memory will delete snoopPkt
}
// since we're the official target but we aren't responding,
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ Cache<TagStore>::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, BlkType *blk,
Packet snoopPkt(pkt, true); // clear flags
snoopPkt.setExpressSnoop();
snoopPkt.senderState = new ForwardResponseRecord(pkt, this);
cpuSidePort->sendTimingSnoop(&snoopPkt);
cpuSidePort->sendTimingSnoopReq(&snoopPkt);
if (snoopPkt.memInhibitAsserted()) {
// cache-to-cache response from some upper cache
assert(!alreadyResponded);
@@ -1336,11 +1336,9 @@ Cache<TagStore>::snoopTiming(PacketPtr pkt)
template<class TagStore>
bool
Cache<TagStore>::CpuSidePort::recvTimingSnoop(PacketPtr pkt)
Cache<TagStore>::CpuSidePort::recvTimingSnoopResp(PacketPtr pkt)
{
// Express snoop responses from master to slave, e.g., from L1 to L2
assert(pkt->isResponse());
cache->timingAccess(pkt);
return true;
}
@@ -1492,7 +1490,7 @@ Cache<TagStore>::getTimingPacket()
PacketPtr snoop_pkt = new Packet(tgt_pkt, true);
snoop_pkt->setExpressSnoop();
snoop_pkt->senderState = mshr;
cpuSidePort->sendTimingSnoop(snoop_pkt);
cpuSidePort->sendTimingSnoopReq(snoop_pkt);
if (snoop_pkt->memInhibitAsserted()) {
markInService(mshr, snoop_pkt);
@@ -1557,9 +1555,8 @@ Cache<TagStore>::CpuSidePort::getAddrRanges()
template<class TagStore>
bool
Cache<TagStore>::CpuSidePort::recvTiming(PacketPtr pkt)
Cache<TagStore>::CpuSidePort::recvTimingReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
assert(pkt->isRequest());
// always let inhibited requests through even if blocked
if (!pkt->memInhibitAsserted() && blocked) {
DPRINTF(Cache,"Scheduling a retry while blocked\n");
@@ -1575,7 +1572,6 @@ template<class TagStore>
Tick
Cache<TagStore>::CpuSidePort::recvAtomic(PacketPtr pkt)
{
assert(pkt->isRequest());
// atomic request
return cache->atomicAccess(pkt);
}
@@ -1584,7 +1580,6 @@ template<class TagStore>
void
Cache<TagStore>::CpuSidePort::recvFunctional(PacketPtr pkt)
{
assert(pkt->isRequest());
// functional request
cache->functionalAccess(pkt, true);
}
@@ -1605,7 +1600,7 @@ CpuSidePort::CpuSidePort(const std::string &_name, Cache<TagStore> *_cache,
template<class TagStore>
bool
Cache<TagStore>::MemSidePort::recvTiming(PacketPtr pkt)
Cache<TagStore>::MemSidePort::recvTimingResp(PacketPtr pkt)
{
// this needs to be fixed so that the cache updates the mshr and sends the
// packet back out on the link, but it probably won't happen so until this
@@ -1613,27 +1608,23 @@ Cache<TagStore>::MemSidePort::recvTiming(PacketPtr pkt)
if (pkt->wasNacked())
panic("Need to implement cache resending nacked packets!\n");
assert(pkt->isResponse());
cache->handleResponse(pkt);
return true;
}
// Express snooping requests to memside port
template<class TagStore>
bool
Cache<TagStore>::MemSidePort::recvTimingSnoop(PacketPtr pkt)
void
Cache<TagStore>::MemSidePort::recvTimingSnoopReq(PacketPtr pkt)
{
// handle snooping requests
assert(pkt->isRequest());
cache->snoopTiming(pkt);
return true;
}
template<class TagStore>
Tick
Cache<TagStore>::MemSidePort::recvAtomicSnoop(PacketPtr pkt)
{
assert(pkt->isRequest());
// atomic snoop
return cache->snoopAtomic(pkt);
}
@@ -1642,7 +1633,6 @@ template<class TagStore>
void
Cache<TagStore>::MemSidePort::recvFunctionalSnoop(PacketPtr pkt)
{
assert(pkt->isRequest());
// functional snoop (note that in contrast to atomic we don't have
// a specific functionalSnoop method, as they have the same
// behaviour regardless)
@@ -1668,7 +1658,7 @@ Cache<TagStore>::MemSidePacketQueue::sendDeferredPacket()
} else {
MSHR *mshr = dynamic_cast<MSHR*>(pkt->senderState);
waitingOnRetry = !port.sendTiming(pkt);
waitingOnRetry = !masterPort.sendTimingReq(pkt);
if (waitingOnRetry) {
DPRINTF(CachePort, "now waiting on a retry\n");