Fix idd4w*

drampower-main.tex

@@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ Interface -> comparison with SPICE, maybe use a random pattern in spice with fix
 Core -> we do not yet have a measurement platform for DDR5/LPDDR5/HBM3... where we can issue specific command patterns to DRAM and compare it with the results provided by DRAMPower.
 \todo{Marco, Derek}
 % IDD Patterns mit Daimler Messung vergleichen 
-In order to verify the power estimates of the new DRAMPower implementation, several measurements are performed on DRAMs from three different vendors based on a real LPDDR4 memory measurement platform~\cite{feldmann_23}.
+To verify the power estimates of the new DRAMPower implementation, we use measurement data from DRAMs of three different vendors, as reported in a real LPDDR4 memory measurement platform study~\cite{feldmann_23}.
 Each DRAM is operated with six different access patterns, which are analogous to the following $I_{DD}$ currents:
 \tikz{\node[circle,draw,inner sep=1pt] {\tiny 1}}~$I_{DD}0$*,
 \tikz{\node[circle,draw,inner sep=1pt] {\tiny 2}}~$I_{DD}4R$,
@@ -1235,17 +1235,18 @@ Each DRAM is operated with six different access patterns, which are analogous to
 \tikz{\node[circle,draw,inner sep=1pt] {\tiny 5}}~$I_{DD}2N$ and
 \tikz{\node[circle,draw,inner sep=1pt] {\tiny 6}}~$I_{DD}6$.
 As it was not possible to reproduce the usual $I_{DD}0$ pattern of ACT-PRE for the measurement platform, $I_{DD}0$* is a variation using the pattern ACT-RD-PRE, which is also resembled in the DRAMPower simulation.
+Also, the measurement platform was not able to accurately measure the write current $I_{DD}4W$
 The initial simulations are based on the current values specified in the datasheet of the specific vendor.
 Then, based on the actual measurements, the current values are reapplied to a second simulation.
 The results are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:power_plot}.
-% \begin{figure}
-%    \centering
-%    \resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{%
-%    \input{img/power_plot}
-%    }
-%    \caption{Average Power Consumption of Simulations and Measurements for Different Vendors}
-%    \label{fig:power_plot}
-% \end{figure}
+\begin{figure}
+   \centering
+   \resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{%
+   \input{img/power_plot}
+   }
+   \caption{Average Power Consumption of Simulations and Measurements for Different Vendors}
+   \label{fig:power_plot}
+\end{figure}
 As it can be seen, the $I_{DD}$ currents in the datasheet are overly pessimistic for all vendors:
 The simulations based on the datasheets show on average a $4.8\times$ higher power consumption than the actual power measurements.
 However, when the measured currents are applied to the simulation, there is still a small discrepancy: